From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NyT6y-0002Qb-4Y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2010 16:55:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E417E0BBA; Sun, 4 Apr 2010 16:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.160]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E1DE0B9D for ; Sun, 4 Apr 2010 16:55:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1270400140; l=1173; s=domk; d=akhuettel.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To: References:Date:Subject:To:From:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=UHm8NokSf/N1M01G5x96isaDyg4=; b=abHcmLq9tfzx/D/9ZD82lJUqh3JyZBKoQgRK8hBu1qgpVhXen6JPBRueXs0LSx4/Mu7 Vm6m9OftBiLlPDYDSiPVieB11Aqlu875ntNXyVZiW0GdJdgppsHn6fWmyuTSWACz/aad2 YSprRLK2R+FBIQKrKnaptpNicO5PLLrdGJ8= X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyy/54wX4oRGP6NKjoZDg== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from pinacolada.localnet ([81.27.171.175]) by post.strato.de (klopstock mo7) (RZmta 23.0) with (EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted) ESMTP id 601ec9m34Efs6j for ; Sun, 4 Apr 2010 18:55:40 +0200 (MEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 18:55:12 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.2 (Linux/2.6.31-gentoo-r10; KDE/4.4.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <4BB70F5E.7010101@gentoo.org> <4BB713D5.7000909@gentoo.org> <4BB7181A.6050907@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4BB7181A.6050907@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3498346.WmcKNieq0h"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201004041855.18160.mail@akhuettel.de> X-Archives-Salt: 20d1458a-6909-4f68-954e-ca5fa86db217 X-Archives-Hash: 3fa07916ed3dfa3e6571fc88bcfd9a39 --nextPart3498346.WmcKNieq0h Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Samstag 03 April 2010 12:27:38 schrieb Krzysztof Pawlik: > >> Sounds good, can we at the same time get RESOLVED OBSOLETE (for bugs > >> that are not valid anymore due to changed situation, RESOLVED INVALID > >> isn't applicable in this case as it implies the bug is and was invalid > >> from the begining). +1 for OBSOLETE, that would give a clear response to outdated stable reques= ts=20 etc... =2D-=20 Dr. Andreas K. Huettel Institute for Experimental and Applied Physics University of Regensburg D-93040 Regensburg Germany tel. +49 151 241 67748 (mobile) e-mail mail@akhuettel.de http://www.akhuettel.de/research/ --nextPart3498346.WmcKNieq0h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAku4xHYACgkQ3ao2Zwy3NWpftQCfVh0n8bVf4/rOF2WL1TSOWjXE MnQAn27GxxU+v2f+xVRV5z6+EW0IiFD3 =+bbP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3498346.WmcKNieq0h--