From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ny0tg-0002jE-67 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 10:48:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4A03E0A60; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 10:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pw0-f53.google.com (mail-pw0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A689E09F7 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 10:48:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwj10 with SMTP id 10so1936470pwj.40 for ; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 03:48:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=mSy54h4VjqXm8KlyiqMzC9gpUY/Gax7+2SP25gINpuE=; b=CnGzvM1DVd8NGVyF8qnO/P+T3dVgf9F40J5LBI8dkcXj83bH9wZzib16JrAdBr6v/L w/UquI5Zqw1XffILCyjxyE+2ikwCNZ0QDCUNdOi8gngW/MfkOmucwwqQJoxBulnEsfQw 05ZclneVhtr4aOkvmiTZ9D+b5RTPxMTN1w7hs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Yr5rJai4hJCZNbXkgbbUV5CTPfRb00MqREuOEAhRcxcQFw1T3XUD7FeZlaMarN3nC8 JyJCJCkBmMSiD5UzrJANB03N6I9np9u8ZJiLrt/hsUIxk2V3HQe4zZ5jPYAO6hliHEyk Lp1g2X27AzvSTsj6O1RqoUh0TOroON8s7wNOE= Received: by 10.141.15.17 with SMTP id s17mr2294333rvi.14.1270291682392; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 03:48:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.gmail.com (c-67-171-128-62.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.171.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm8828077pzk.6.2010.04.03.03.48.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 03 Apr 2010 03:48:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by smtp.gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 03 Apr 2010 03:46:10 -0700 Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 03:46:10 -0700 From: Brian Harring To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] More reliable hiding preserved libraries Message-ID: <20100403104610.GR11663@hrair> References: <201004031238.18500.reavertm@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="D8QxnvyRlKGQJxl7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201004031238.18500.reavertm@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: 4bc1ab68-32aa-4134-bf86-28c09702e88d X-Archives-Hash: c7ecd01ab17c1beff57ea02f6502fa43 --D8QxnvyRlKGQJxl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 12:38:17PM +0200, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > exactly it's supposed to be achieved. As far as portage/pkgcore is concer= ned,=20 > maybe - as Brian Harring suggested - sandbox could be used to somehow "hi= de"=20 > preserved libraries or preserved library directory from ebuild environmen= t=20 > (preserved library directory a'ka "purgatory" - libs could be moved there= when=20 > considered orphaned). When I've tried experimenting w/ this I've had zero luck in=20 intercepting lib loadup on that one. ~harring --D8QxnvyRlKGQJxl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAku3HHIACgkQsiLx3HvNzgfM2ACfV6z1HaSd95CRZpqSCGTvm9WS 9D0AnAm2fiHWAo2teSI+DxP6aCyqmSXY =PoCO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --D8QxnvyRlKGQJxl7--