From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NxpUF-0007fs-Gm for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 22:37:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99685E0A59; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 22:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f210.google.com (mail-bw0-f210.google.com [209.85.218.210]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8E5E09E8 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 22:36:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so1844204bwz.30 for ; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:36:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=TRT0UQF1+HZuaTCNNZRUVb4R3wcCDh+Q+hEugEt5liE=; b=YABP9OU12JZzQIUZelNI6vFPeQU0l43Y3QkP2gOOjxxWLN8vSfkab5H708pC+XU67F ix9R6pL+hsgR1z/8+dvpceO6d5F5IvWjyep/md7Jg0KhWOG1EgNvzoqYRLEgzt8ISUzP J/xidn7gVqa1Wzd03Mpeq4rR6mIS92xrT8VFw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=IJvp+sGYaeaZccfF7UqswRY26PVMzvExTo0LF3x1L7RCAT2yr0gKgA5BKvnfe1msqY /sJDPEvL99A/xeBe6kXYE9Ou03s8kJ6xNJJxZco1AdhkNWnHVDmF1U2tv4vpQUfMJiD+ t9s2rezA0bRdA4JEThoMNaB/a8LSEq9ejVCAs= Received: by 10.204.140.212 with SMTP id j20mr3581917bku.119.1270247805762; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shiny-one.home (host86-183-39-28.range86-183.btcentralplus.com [86.183.39.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d5sm81244962bkd.19.2010.04.02.15.36.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:36:45 -0700 (PDT) From: David Leverton To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 23:36:39 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20100331092035.GA11663@hrair> <201004011804.49097.levertond@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201004022336.39740.levertond@googlemail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 68cb3123-89fc-4eda-9902-661d2cf4b655 X-Archives-Hash: 1a27fb29f55e4442eef249fe6669a774 On Thursday 01 April 2010 19:39:43 Dror Levin wrote: > Here's another suggestion: how about we don't impose any ridiculous > constraints on development and keep this discussion on the technological > side of the original proposal? It's not ridiculous to expect to have a new EAPI in a reasonable amount of time. Other features are already done, so holding them back until this one is complete would itself be placing constraints on developers who have a use for the other features.