public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Please don't turn this into a pissing match. (was: pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative)
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 20:01:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100401200159.24211fbe@snowmobile> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2w2becdd071004011158t7caaa532t926c4e184ff1737b@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1160 bytes --]

On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 21:58:29 +0300
Dror Levin <spatz@gentoo.org> wrote:
>  On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 20:32, Ciaran McCreesh <
> ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > In that case, why would you like to see VALID_USE as well as
> > pkg_pretend? Why not just use pkg_pretend, which is already in EAPI
> > 4 and which can do everything VALID_USE can do plus several useful
> > things that it can't?
> >
> > With pkg_pretend you can do VALID_USE using a simple eclass...
> >
> With pkg_pretend you can also implement USE deps, would you like to
> abolish them as well?

Use dependencies can be handled by the package manager in a useful way.

> This is data and should be treated as such.
> Using code to describe it is possible but suboptimal, if there's a
> suggestion that allows for describing this as data rather than with
> code then it is superior for all the reasons already stated.

There's nothing that can make use of it as data, so there's no point.

If, in the distant future, something becomes available that can make
use of it as data, then in a future EAPI we can start using both as
appropriate.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-01 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-01 17:23 [gentoo-dev] Please don't turn this into a pissing match. (was: pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative) Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-04-01 17:32 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2010-04-01 18:58   ` Dror Levin
2010-04-01 19:01     ` Ciaran McCreesh [this message]
2010-04-02 13:26 ` Ben de Groot
2010-04-02 21:15   ` Nirbheek Chauhan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100401200159.24211fbe@snowmobile \
    --to=ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox