From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NxIA3-0002Ur-1i for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:02:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89A02E09EA; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 11:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C56E0970 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 11:02:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 941D51B4025; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 11:01:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.13 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.13 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.469, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mNJ8+LEM9uvx; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 11:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pv0-f177.google.com (mail-pv0-f177.google.com [74.125.83.177]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41ABB1B411F; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 11:01:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pvf33 with SMTP id 33so322804pvf.36 for ; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 04:01:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=csyknhyIyP2TtqRiWs53E4Z10zW2pIk5rq2aS4ckMW0=; b=UafV6SXL+Q8/6nQ1BNnvSEg/N+A3LSi8hNofdUv5NWz6aVgcr86Gv2w9CRY2IJ2Blo zZ18l3yRaHrSlltBoJlRAOdaUhz4xR8EKv1nqYj8Ht2q2BfWaw1GFOpTVQj4gUX3r9P5 aZAkqDzi2zecD+fEiAlc93/ULbBC5foMo1bYU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=f9PpR11fDwilfSUe6hclo9sdEOwrLnqP50PGvf6TDXAfKUUq0NRg1XQR6OZdeu/upa eK6Ev+AZ9lLacjpbatX0h4BlG7LAakDdCyrjGtwsdgdHTkODEoG//CLJZ46D263BDvtq y5BJcGWbfDiXVVGwMJQas47mtoeK/gYtc0TyQ= Received: by 10.115.117.6 with SMTP id u6mr994339wam.191.1270119707443; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 04:01:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.gmail.com (c-67-171-128-62.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.171.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm6744297pzk.2.2010.04.01.04.01.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 01 Apr 2010 04:01:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by smtp.gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 01 Apr 2010 03:59:54 -0700 Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 03:59:54 -0700 From: Brian Harring To: eva@gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative Message-ID: <20100401105954.GL11663@hrair> References: <20100331092035.GA11663@hrair> <20100331174925.GA16267@faith> <20100331194626.GG11663@hrair> <20100331205628.368fb02c@snowmobile> <20100401073109.GI11663@hrair> <20100401084102.2560f3a3@snowmobile> <20100401075608.GJ11663@hrair> <1270116620.17214.1.camel@gdartigu.lan.rep.sj> <20100401101825.GK11663@hrair> <1270118530.17214.4.camel@gdartigu.lan.rep.sj> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8cpS+6Cx+xtICsjy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1270118530.17214.4.camel@gdartigu.lan.rep.sj> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: 4e63fc80-3fd0-4ba6-a756-c54a2e1dc4b1 X-Archives-Hash: 76943fcee7a62479b4559f2aa3a77cf1 --8cpS+6Cx+xtICsjy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 12:42:10PM +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > Basically, you want the PM to lie to the ebuild in some fashion. =20 > > Since pkg_pretend is free form, it's effectively impossible to cover=20 > > the scenarios it could check on- consider checking the kernel=20 > > config/version, or checking the active jvm/python version. >=20 > except the kernel will not change during the upgrade, Pardon, I wasn't clear- I was referring to kernel sources, not=20 the running kernel. ~harring --8cpS+6Cx+xtICsjy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAku0fKoACgkQsiLx3HvNzgffIgCgzRi+taAosU6PL5fFVR9aSRTu CVAAnietlOcCgTD71gCtaznB+tHhGZo7 =RK/m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8cpS+6Cx+xtICsjy--