From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nx8Wv-0001zB-KG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:45:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C323E0D18; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 00:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25770E0D13 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 00:44:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06FB1B408C for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 00:44:51 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Google Apps Standard Edition @ gentoo.org Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:44:38 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.33.1; KDE/4.4.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <201003311909.07731.vapier@gentoo.org> <4BB3DF7B.1070808@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4BB3DF7B.1070808@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3252458.eOjOWae1VN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003312044.39253.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: e0d71d02-9aff-4f88-a65e-4c463473cf63 X-Archives-Hash: 395d2d3df00108bec47e767017b1fe54 --nextPart3252458.eOjOWae1VN Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday 31 March 2010 19:49:15 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > On 04/01/10 01:09, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > no one is forcing you to, nor is anyone talking about having teams use > > it. if Gentoo developers themselves choose to, it's going to happen > > irregardless of what Alec is proposing. >=20 > we are talking about public, shared work on gentoo - not about stuff > people do in private. not necessarily. we're talking about Gentoo developers using Google featur= es=20 however they see fit. not everything done via your g.o e-mail address is=20 required to be Gentoo related, nor will it ever be. if a Gentoo dev as part of a Gentoo project started requiring Google docs t= o=20 collaborate, then we can address the missing needs at that time if people f= eel=20 that the Google requirement is "restrictive". the rest of your gentoo-dev vs gentoo-core logic has been addressed by=20 Brian/Jorge -- this is the internet, you have no privacy, get over it. =2Dmike --nextPart3252458.eOjOWae1VN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJLs+x3AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBzEAP/2wRiIc2xG59+fppcbYWESBY vrPbTlDTJIAsg4EVivlEZfFgZ3mw+yv/5oHXj2ILhU1Amw23Xpu8rUxC1j9a9dWm /HlnqxVquwzLY2smm5w1gA2yV0eENwF3ZXdWMMduXLHY9vTPaxbllycnNWm/4zEN hCPVvIz+o4Ll+bFI9pSBcTMYG8lu/m4VD7mbL6v+vqrrey85rBulCf5rXu2m0Ffe yPq/prK7Rwq6DzYKLG1ZVtH2KMXKc6l2C/GGdRgM9J7dA1QDSsetXKPEOssBp2BB rQ8e46HD8e5Swj8v474TovcB6q+laz5+TJ6eexJELQE8kfBN4lShQnZKZS63DC9M S6UVSC0D45YnS4yh0S9T/rnUPzFc/cepRQBfoKytc/ociVwz70n9sASpFMW01beH bxExcpM4s3FLrmLUxotblqpBKbQxkrddMyK2Rf3wrJGRXyYaGjqdz2tkWFmrnMR8 7Y0WdMQkExsE8axHzz4kW+i13d0xa3BuJ5ACk2Peyjxt586fn64X/ChOpmGMyyDg EHCRDagd4YJBpH/8jCVoVlAmMSE7PzpGEiJtSWN5OjcS3ghRZiUlchGhRJbcEFpg 577e9zZkg4AMN8AqEDxwLmRBtArg9B+t98+sr3c98VGsmFYNFRA0vKzwLW10kTEr eG0eg8OBhVdn+OTSLf6Z =TugS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3252458.eOjOWae1VN--