From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nx72Z-0007yw-1C for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:09:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C9B6E0D7E; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:09:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F37E0D5D for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:09:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3040A64449 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:09:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Google Apps Standard Edition @ gentoo.org Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:09:07 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.33.1; KDE/4.4.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <201003311720.40465.vapier@gentoo.org> <4BB3BF9D.9010500@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4BB3BF9D.9010500@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1622097.UeRVLEAxgl"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003311909.07731.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: e112824f-03c1-4c01-a07e-4146703f2a8c X-Archives-Hash: 3608dfcc050020d1be3699f078a0063d --nextPart1622097.UeRVLEAxgl Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday 31 March 2010 17:33:17 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > On 03/31/10 23:20, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Wednesday 31 March 2010 16:28:15 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > >> To be very clear: Please take my vote against increasing dependencies = on > >> Google. > >=20 > > so dont use it > >=20 > >> On a side note: This is not a technical discussion only. > >> As such please use gentoo-core for this next time. Thanks. > >=20 > > incorrect ... it should either be gentoo-dev or gentoo-project. there = is > > no need for use of the closed gentoo-core list. >=20 > did you even read all of my mail? take it down a notch > i cannot "not use it" - that's my point. i'll be forced to, forced in > or forced out. no one is forcing you to, nor is anyone talking about having teams use it. = if=20 Gentoo developers themselves choose to, it's going to happen irregardless o= f=20 what Alec is proposing. > it's nothing for gentoo-dev as it's not purely technical. > can it be more obvious? your logic does not lead to the statement that gentoo-core is the appropria= te=20 place. as i already suggested, gentoo-project is an alternative to gentoo-= dev=20 for non-technical issues. as has been said many times in the past, gentoo- core should not be thought of as the "non-technical gentoo-dev alternative". a bit ironic you espouse using open source software on fully controlled=20 systems in one half while suggesting people use the closed gentoo-core mail= ing=20 list in another ... =2Dmike --nextPart1622097.UeRVLEAxgl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJLs9YTAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBAHMQANUQnkFp5LLKHabhbagY6QlP 7aBYe9hMZv4kznHDWC+WR/QB+zl2ae0gH/15G2/vzG4R1gRybNfsu1O7TzPC313c dSj6NQRz1iAAzXLon5W18jW5L6GAmck303tkVcVvzQmUU6tvY85SnaBz+S+bDZF7 IOdDFK6PeAKh5kax/hFtz+hVNcih1xdlQoRfH1qir4HRvRTgRkxSFlP/3Rv7GVRl OMfFTa4FgM+JUxdPDDMX89Tn9hkGi97Au9h/meug0pVek7rU/oXl7lnWWQP3q/SK JL3LWTgSfr2HAngzbhXjIx8WOQ7Gt4+iZs3usesI2GP4YIU0SoWQhYUeRwR7M3pC 6QmSRMjHtnW0ixIGUNp/2XLEJeyY/dCYjU673yozg/75vFLgp9ONb0gNcMRE69uv fA0rhK+znswV4PA57i80R8pIUOH/C+nXv5n6pI53e8jGLi086LMibJbTrqi8Ocfq sKCKNPNGantlzTAwOHCNai6qpOquqmjY6c5su+HiTvaXZ5yEP9SYGBkLg6004wM2 /TTsG0l1UVcWbaWPNXc05Ole3mvA/xQZeZL0knaW0/5DyLst1s//vBudrh7W7dUg OmixJf39cWBzVcojf2eC9tzHn09OI33Vu+PFPJNG15ys7vzWLgJ9JoRm+u6m20a+ sb5cxG7FNkC36rLHEFkj =FBFB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1622097.UeRVLEAxgl--