From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-40296-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1NwITa-0003aX-5y
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:10:11 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39DBAE0A00;
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:10:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-fx0-f224.google.com (mail-fx0-f224.google.com [209.85.220.224])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45DE8E0AAD
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:09:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxm24 with SMTP id 24so71599fxm.26
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date
:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:disposition-notification-to
:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
bh=1DRyDcnEuWhbeYpGYvrzfBC9lIcLdaxRmHMQv5/RfZI=;
b=almmPX430p/Tk0fkYHaA7LwMpSXh4VVQjBUbZtfwYXIUHMN/1iS/ZT5Rnh+pBqeoyQ
niEB7IkYlM+wLQAh6rwbnO6S4nybupkkuf/YzzCYWhxJTs0iwLG12N8HtKYiUzGzAPk0
5wKW04unKDVC8Mlj/84IxgncwomaaxrXzA7EE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
:disposition-notification-to:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
b=oyINFBWhYoy3Eao9dndf/l477J88mpgkr4/ACU3oCZWhxFug1+NJBBgSNUfblfwMhZ
tQQJbWGbtsMYRaMOOfF7jd+QGGWSSgoFyu+dw2sjFEv7MZt4j9xGzyDdOzGVJ7IdPQFW
irurCQj8dFZnHPRP6uc0mqtZyysxE+d3reoYU=
Received: by 10.223.1.19 with SMTP id 19mr285813fad.61.1269882591142;
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lebrodyl.localnet (aafi207.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.4.138.207])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm3142497fxm.10.2010.03.29.10.09.50
(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Reworking package stabilization policies
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:10:06 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.2 (Linux/2.6.31-gentoo-r10; KDE/4.4.2; x86_64; ; )
References: <20100327205841.GA12996@linux1> <201003280747.28790.reavertm@gmail.com> <1269847838.24530.80.camel@tablet>
In-Reply-To: <1269847838.24530.80.camel@tablet>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="utf-8"
Message-Id: <201003291910.06692.reavertm@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: c03da690-183c-420a-9e9e-41fb40e1f71d
X-Archives-Hash: b7d8e8101d76b8c407ba0916568ca9e9
On Monday 29 of March 2010 09:30:38 Peter Volkov wrote:
> =D0=92 =D0=92=D1=81=D0=BA, 28/03/2010 =D0=B2 07:47 +0200, Maciej Mrozow=
ski =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82:
> > No, seriously - given the fact that some of my packages were even
> > stabilized without contacting me (app-misc/hal-cups-utils,
> > app-admin/system-config- printer-common)
>=20
> If you know packages are broken why they were not hardmasked? If they
> have no problems what why it was bad idea to mark them stable?
They are not broken, they're just not suitable. It's like stabilizing gcc=
-2.95=20
now, even when it won't work with some recent KDE/boost.
hal-cups-utils is not a problem
system-config-printer-common-1.1.13 is as it's being used by maybe=20
incompatible now system-config-printer-kde from testing arch (I've raised=
=20
those deps now), besides I wanted to wait for polkit-1 with this package=20
(otherwise dbus "newprinternotifications" can be received only by root or=
=20
require tweaking dbus conf to work out of the box . That's why kde-
base/system-config-printer-kde and kde-base/printer-applet were intention=
ally=20
left out from KDE-4.3.3 stabilization list.
--=20
regards
MM