From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-40257-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Nvd6h-0006Vq-8m
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:59:47 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CA41E07C1;
	Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:59:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gw0-f53.google.com (mail-gw0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FA1E0511
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:58:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gwaa12 with SMTP id a12so2791754gwa.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:date:from:to
         :subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-disposition:user-agent;
        bh=MgKeWd4HvjcE40JJEn5487cmSwFzuaN/o5eqP3Sp62s=;
        b=lw7uQaOUPaenXzTYeehRv13fFjcNFMMxLDaHunPgD1YZJptFRc6xi7quzw6PY4UQuU
         4pmd3fIaOF4c84ZqhrKyoujCaeY4zxUXt1kdk2nfUlDM4zJC+qzWcDEWW+ddPTej3c7J
         8xNOPfRQl0ibd5jasHozAq6JxyUwL11iPZjh0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to
         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:user-agent;
        b=JaWQ7mZQp5yL9uNBj2sAz8kAVn8h+hmWpgNR8ZW1tyCy/e55i5YKKyKA5tVsC7DFE2
         2MGzUhy/LYkQLLg1P3tlnNGCAanKJcHHorWTNDDZZ46niVtyC6aZAE0cF9tqBn3kwdJn
         vIZoHJ5bsHvMjU3P7hwE9jdDZl1MuJERW6lM8=
Received: by 10.100.74.3 with SMTP id w3mr4751765ana.104.1269723524313;
        Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-183-49-63.tx.res.rr.com [76.183.49.63])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm1486612gxk.15.2010.03.27.13.58.42
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@gmail.com>
Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:58:41 -0500
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:58:41 -0500
From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] reminding slacker arch's to handle bugs
Message-ID: <20100327205841.GA12996@linux1>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Archives-Salt: 7ea3b9e4-eae4-4eed-9117-8c1509beef62
X-Archives-Hash: 72d7d2d47d1c31d7ebd795380cd4edc1


--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 05:45:51PM +0100, Torsten Veller wrote:
> * Petteri R?ty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org>:
> > So let's summarize for assigning to the single arch:
>=20
> > In support (and my comments in support):
> >  - Can be used as a gentle reminder for slacker arches
>=20
> And if not "only one arch" or "single arch" is slacking?
> I guess you would find another gentle way to remind them.
>=20
>=20
> How about a tool generating mails to arch teams, which lists all
> STABLEREQ, KEQWORDREQ bugs to which the arch team is CC'ed for a month?
> (Or probably easier or possible at all: which weren't changed for 30 days=
=2E)
=20
 I know that I have several bugs right now with minor arch's on them
 waiting to be stabilized.  A couple have been waiting for a very long
 time.  I have even pinged some of the bugs several times with no response.

 Is there anything else I can do to get these arch teams attention?

 William


--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkuucYEACgkQblQW9DDEZThbtACeNJM5lh/npibT2f0NaMk4nF15
/nYAn3qeIbjZ0JKiM1p4wNXOeBzKlD8Y
=MPW7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o--