From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nvd6h-0006Vq-8m for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:59:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CA41E07C1; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:59:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gw0-f53.google.com (mail-gw0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FA1E0511 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwaa12 with SMTP id a12so2791754gwa.40 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:58:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:date:from:to :subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=MgKeWd4HvjcE40JJEn5487cmSwFzuaN/o5eqP3Sp62s=; b=lw7uQaOUPaenXzTYeehRv13fFjcNFMMxLDaHunPgD1YZJptFRc6xi7quzw6PY4UQuU 4pmd3fIaOF4c84ZqhrKyoujCaeY4zxUXt1kdk2nfUlDM4zJC+qzWcDEWW+ddPTej3c7J 8xNOPfRQl0ibd5jasHozAq6JxyUwL11iPZjh0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:user-agent; b=JaWQ7mZQp5yL9uNBj2sAz8kAVn8h+hmWpgNR8ZW1tyCy/e55i5YKKyKA5tVsC7DFE2 2MGzUhy/LYkQLLg1P3tlnNGCAanKJcHHorWTNDDZZ46niVtyC6aZAE0cF9tqBn3kwdJn vIZoHJ5bsHvMjU3P7hwE9jdDZl1MuJERW6lM8= Received: by 10.100.74.3 with SMTP id w3mr4751765ana.104.1269723524313; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:58:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-183-49-63.tx.res.rr.com [76.183.49.63]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm1486612gxk.15.2010.03.27.13.58.42 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:58:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:58:41 -0500 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:58:41 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] reminding slacker arch's to handle bugs Message-ID: <20100327205841.GA12996@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: 7ea3b9e4-eae4-4eed-9117-8c1509beef62 X-Archives-Hash: 72d7d2d47d1c31d7ebd795380cd4edc1 --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 05:45:51PM +0100, Torsten Veller wrote: > * Petteri R?ty : > > So let's summarize for assigning to the single arch: >=20 > > In support (and my comments in support): > > - Can be used as a gentle reminder for slacker arches >=20 > And if not "only one arch" or "single arch" is slacking? > I guess you would find another gentle way to remind them. >=20 >=20 > How about a tool generating mails to arch teams, which lists all > STABLEREQ, KEQWORDREQ bugs to which the arch team is CC'ed for a month? > (Or probably easier or possible at all: which weren't changed for 30 days= =2E) =20 I know that I have several bugs right now with minor arch's on them waiting to be stabilized. A couple have been waiting for a very long time. I have even pinged some of the bugs several times with no response. Is there anything else I can do to get these arch teams attention? William --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuucYEACgkQblQW9DDEZThbtACeNJM5lh/npibT2f0NaMk4nF15 /nYAn3qeIbjZ0JKiM1p4wNXOeBzKlD8Y =MPW7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o--