From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-40256-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1NvZxb-0001ce-QS
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:38:12 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 63A2CE0829;
	Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:38:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gy0-f181.google.com (mail-gy0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82ACEE0825
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:37:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gyh20 with SMTP id 20so4812257gyh.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:date:from:to
         :subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
        bh=olnT1NsuCYhYHI3EnKSTVlTNugzrsUMCkjvnx0l4vP8=;
        b=xf2QwaDGec2Nf8JP7wG89eJ+4MfkGLTg4qxbU/7SUIhaCp7LovIh5bnf67Bv1LLQe/
         HBAaUKcjZKxn5Z/MfOcvyXbAVknR2c7ZiLbl5AZojU2hfDoxP1TNa7K6Lf8OqNx7wO7F
         WTeBPXkQjAsp0BUtIcO3kZbX4uT1UbD1RwjVQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
         :user-agent;
        b=xpY7J4jjXrYnxP4U0rM8uRMNJTUlXUbEsnqU0FGEikIJftPMqcZiOa+xmBiVu3PVAW
         Oy0xE6N195DfU52CJBNi5NWAEQJaY984b9rj/u7bO/rz9pfap+Cq2VZB8Nn25eEndS0C
         1JTMEAEEbuvvH7dmGVJqFTua1iV7G0PPu1vhY=
Received: by 10.150.233.18 with SMTP id f18mr2966994ybh.167.1269711461221;
        Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-183-49-63.tx.res.rr.com [76.183.49.63])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 35sm549662yxh.33.2010.03.27.10.37.38
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@gmail.com>
Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:37:37 -0500
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:37:37 -0500
From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item
Message-ID: <20100327173737.GA11573@linux1>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <201003241814.45606.Arfrever@gentoo.org>
 <4BACAA07.90409@gentoo.org>
 <20100326154037.GB5254@hrair>
 <201003261657.23058.Arfrever@gentoo.org>
 <4BACDBFC.70706@gmail.com>
 <r2ob41005391003260928z2b2fff78k86202c8c49434a8d@mail.gmail.com>
 <514ddb279c50229fe502fd9bee495cd3@jolexa.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <514ddb279c50229fe502fd9bee495cd3@jolexa.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Archives-Salt: 26177411-d6ab-4983-9a82-5edbef5dc559
X-Archives-Hash: f072917054c1b3c3c47683ee2346bd38


--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 05:27:46PM +0000, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>=20
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:28:29 +0000, Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> >> As a user, I still think this could turn into a real mess. ??I think
> there
> >> will be quite a few that will see python being updated, run
> python-updater
> >> and switch it to the new python. ??At that point, it is going to hit t=
he
> fan.
> >> ??I know because this is what I always do. ??News item or not, when
> python
> >> gets updated, I run python-updater and make sure it is selected.

If you don't bother reading news items or messages from packages, there
is nothing we can do.  I don't feel that this is an excuse for holding
up stabilization.

>  * Messages for package dev-lang/python-3.1.2:
>=20
>  *=20
>  * WARNING!
>  * Many Python modules haven't been ported yet to Python 3.*.
>  * Python 3 hasn't been activated and Python wrapper is still configured
> to use Python 2.
>  * You can manually activate Python 3.1 using `eselect python set
> python3.1`.
>  * It is recommended to currently have Python wrapper configured to use
> Python 2.
>  * Having Python wrapper configured to use Python 3 is unsupported.
=20
The message above looks pretty clear to me.  It works, but don't make it
the default.  Having it marked "stable" and being able to use it as the
default python are two separate things, and the maintainer is making it
very clear in this message that it can't be the default python.

William


--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkuuQmEACgkQblQW9DDEZTgRfQCePEGbf1rce1iAZXBfZbyL43o0
HcQAoLgzxfgjbPodGxPmvt7lo/RDOPEB
=Mf96
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk--