From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NuUsz-0006b8-Fn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:00:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B64EDE08FB; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:00:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A051E0851 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from afta-gentoo.localnet (ip-85-198-235-97.broker.com.pl [85.198.235.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF0767FE1 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:00:47 +0000 (UTC) From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis To: Gentoo Development Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:04:51 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.32-tuxonice-r5-AFTA; KDE/4.4.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <201003041923.17749.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <4BAA5134.4000900@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4BAA5134.4000900@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6225678.ZtLcpPbINd"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003241904.52118.Arfrever@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 3a4a4091-6130-4eb4-acbf-dfe4049cb56b X-Archives-Hash: 8cb7d257e27451145b47f06a428b1501 --nextPart6225678.ZtLcpPbINd Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010-03-24 18:51:48 Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr. napisa=C5=82(a): > On 3/24/10 6:35 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: > >> All valid concerns about text already included in the news item have b= een > >> addressed. We don't need to include any unofficial recommendations. > >=20 > > I'll take that as a yes then, you are indeed disregarding the concerns > > and recommendations of your fellow Gentoo developers. > >=20 > > CC'ing devrel because this is getting out of hand. >=20 > I think it's a purely technical issue. The arguments against Python 3 > are mostly in the form "I don't feel it's ready". If it can't be > resolved on the list (some people want Python 3, some don't), shouldn't > the council decide? People, don't want Python 3, probably have already masked it. There is no reason to waste Council's time for decision on what sentence should be included in the news item. =2D-=20 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis --nextPart6225678.ZtLcpPbINd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJLqlREAAoJEFtpjAED8H0Y/EUP/0lzZWcpLKNyjK1dELJxAO3F EgMBPMf0pUWD8D6vUqAVu+eA7P0Ry80SfASqCFA0IyEpE7Yy14amrSsLorUCEUYd B70tKtv1s6ACGM2MV2cYi66DOyIoy8PBQK9Bi7CGj6e1jvIzJZBWnsRtXoqQVufl UdC4hXM/wWklzARS5nttUnO35FWEq11LjeLJfCuS2MoDNBJD6u0zdYabPwFcLvqR YrJj9XRw48xnGdjpMF/8UhoIwpkEeMykgOYXu5Hl+xXn5p5MTlvoGTvwWvb+Uc54 DCLh7z4WoUWACvBpldWbJLxJ1zzPkqieVF59oCXlqd3EVm1lulOGlD4oVAi3EOhz 7WXzuHVQip7YAr8q768MWPPnkes6DECHtKtLluM2Syp70VJA+N34d24G+DeVAicO Fxb9rJms3vyVxbrFHxPzgZPF2KCPOclNKHBkjJLL81SV5QXvHisrgApDKmBCO93u G1maiWAxikO90a9G1vWVl7cOR84l6HiSHKDIVxxYWV/eAoORFFdLvdWyUnp8JOiE CRC/nZ1QMu8/SNDh4JLlWpiaiOubI/Q5oWycDjlsuVANUuqIP8cwmWb81qO041GQ mUlXBA8SybTszVxBKsggQ419XymPl7RuXdjolEIFo/PT1Hnx7Ic9H53HFtHoKnq1 C+6GVy0oNRRL1sZyacn5 =BqoE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6225678.ZtLcpPbINd--