From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nu684-0001OS-R1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:34:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBE6FE0984; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765FEE0972 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from afta-gentoo.localnet (ip-85-198-235-97.broker.com.pl [85.198.235.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51BD1B4010 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:34:21 +0000 (UTC) From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis To: Gentoo Development Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages pulling in python-3*, also they dont require it Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:37:34 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.32-tuxonice-r5-AFTA; KDE/4.4.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <4BA27CE2.7080005@gentoo.org> <201003201511.49740.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <2e0007041003221412i7a3f283an264d750a4e343fde@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2e0007041003221412i7a3f283an264d750a4e343fde@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3636944.5LyrxDI7zs"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003231638.03532.Arfrever@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 93389c55-60f3-443e-883d-00c9b63b298d X-Archives-Hash: c91987d764b9609e40a1fb0edbb9d880 --nextPart3636944.5LyrxDI7zs Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010-03-22 22:12:54 Jacob Godserv napisa=C5=82(a): > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:11, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis > wrote: > > 2010-03-20 01:51:44 Duncan napisa=C5=82(a): > >> So let's just recognize that it's not a perfect situation, create a ne= ws > >> item saying that python-3 will soon (give a date) be unmasked, and sug= gest > >> that users not needing it may wish to package.mask it themselves, with= a > >> link to documentation with specific instructions and a bit more detail= on > >> why they might wish to mask it and under what circumstances they might= not. > >> > >> I'd suggest an unmasking date 30 days after the release of the news it= em. > > > > Python 3 is not masked. The discussion is about stabilization. >=20 > Duncan's comments still apply, though, right? What's against writing a > news item about stabilizing Python? There is already a thread about news item: http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_814e67764c17f88bde94f22e9a392e4f.= xml =2D-=20 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis --nextPart3636944.5LyrxDI7zs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJLqOBbAAoJEFtpjAED8H0YRYoP+gOevTsGHtr5QJLnTRqKEYl/ 4jIzNU2+kKBAfjNAow9J4y4JOaf+c1AeujTKq76IVqkdFvgzUNCyNdPXGI3c5ru9 PU3/wATwzOoZC/2Vk2qrb0ta3lTaNzatffG7N1CefjNmNg2+GPYfzrpehK8KIZgx fiP/+vUPwGaV11mZxIEOiomVakaSaD200t25NyCcafsRZ9PzMYIzJ38sPyHW1eGc bkgHusJHV3kWoN97aveixRmV6bc+O2swDag4TR/ZaAl6mr66/vm08lzH3WZUxOCF pJh29G/p0hVsXdwI5bH4Fw1IDohW2EopzO02IiksNfxlc1MONnoMnRrsitj6excK 8FrPnHO3on2/fGa8oefcnlz+VsgTI+we5gPc56EimEKbS5BYtFOjyl9KArqWM1wb tcmwpEZOxGHTmSH3Nq7JNNQ8rRpE2vlV6WRXYC1q1c+0y/cTSVXwFZpqgmKafEyC /2oEZG1oa7lJk+761EQiEJg/VskG/FKDY86BP5JwXpQywF3mKdG7XWZUbRMAUE7X GTyiP4BS/tNf56MPSb2h7FaMhAK7kdS2JFNha3t9hurYhK9Jq6xF/fLPQPS6Ohb3 Ww8RgX6aNpwUTlPmobQbnAhUaCHyY7ftcCx17nfQf2OHzF8d9o6jIIQ5dN7AmcWO IaW88eU7vqkvoDERn/0m =zDlH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3636944.5LyrxDI7zs--