2010-03-22 22:12:54 Jacob Godserv napisał(a):
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:11, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
> <Arfrever@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > 2010-03-20 01:51:44 Duncan napisał(a):
> >> So let's just recognize that it's not a perfect situation, create a news
> >> item saying that python-3 will soon (give a date) be unmasked, and suggest
> >> that users not needing it may wish to package.mask it themselves, with a
> >> link to documentation with specific instructions and a bit more detail on
> >> why they might wish to mask it and under what circumstances they might not.
> >>
> >> I'd suggest an unmasking date 30 days after the release of the news item.
> >
> > Python 3 is not masked. The discussion is about stabilization.
> 
> Duncan's comments still apply, though, right? What's against writing a
> news item about stabilizing Python?

There is already a thread about news item:
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_814e67764c17f88bde94f22e9a392e4f.xml

-- 
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis