From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nu56p-0005GR-13 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:29:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 064A5E097E; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:29:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com (mail-fx0-f218.google.com [209.85.220.218]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E53E0979 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:28:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so749437fxm.30 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:28:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=pgqb/EVRrDw5ZpCXia3ghO+hrz2XpfUEsoeTLaMdDyA=; b=ebMeSz0M1+d/8NIqYLvD2J6INL3FtbPxEedRtl/SW0RWptQtxGf3VqcrUT963mMPpA K3P7fmbdmybetrWixMeSovCMLkveCn4H7ftpYZWLigKwq5eyqjT1WccO78c4AFh0Or1V MfLNSRj5FnZb1cZl3bmkKNOQSP/ist/Sme3mI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=vfz7MP57xvNEX7zuhaAzzRvYQcuxsdOeHe6kILHpUDnloswujxyeGN/m1lVTzj+mcV I3+DFF52x8BUfs44ab3ZjVL3juJ5u4sQ9f5eoPIPcmYQc6u2Bg0XwVn6vDalkrgTUT/4 E3jJ2ZYhe4BjQmazaqp2u99bXklb8VWSQ7wZk= Received: by 10.87.40.32 with SMTP id s32mr279227fgj.66.1269354511475; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:28:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from graffiti.localnet (athedsl-406460.home.otenet.gr [79.131.139.186]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 3sm533708fge.15.2010.03.23.07.28.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:28:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Theo Chatzimichos From: Theo Chatzimichos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:29:50 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.32-gentoo; KDE/4.4.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <201003041652.56521.tampakrap@gentoo.org> <201003080318.02585.tampakrap@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201003080318.02585.tampakrap@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart11889548.PjtOcI5h6E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003231629.53302.tampakrap@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: b8d3bd74-ffc6-4697-ae3f-c691511a40af X-Archives-Hash: f56744aa243b82804b15b47b9512b4e1 --nextPart11889548.PjtOcI5h6E Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday 08 March 2010 03:17:57 Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > On Thursday 04 March 2010 16:52:50 Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > > Hello > > I have managed to split the desktop profile to gnome and kde submenus. > > The result can be found in kde-crazy overlay (not in layman) [1] > > I splitted every desktop/ folder i found. The following issues raised > > though: 1) I didn't touch the hardened and selinux directories although > > they do contain a desktop folder. Should I proceed in those or not? > > 2) Some mips/ subdirs don't point to targets/, so I guess the split went > > to /dev/null. So I asked ssuominen who suggested to skip the mips > > directories, and I reverted. (Edit: ssuominen just committed changes in > > mips profiles in tree). > > 3) There were no desktop dirs for bsd/prefix etc. > > 4) Also take a look at how I splitted the USE flags (with ssuominen's a= nd > > yngwin's suggestions) and propose your corrections plz. For example, I > > don't really like the firefox flag in kde, and I'd suggest a -firefox > > (ugly, I know) in kde's make.defaults > >=20 > > Please Please Please Please Please TEST / REVIEW (especially the arch > > teams plz) > >=20 > > I'll give three days max for the suggestions here etc, and then I'll > > proceed in creating the news item. So I guess it will be committed in a > > week max. Thanks > >=20 > > [1] http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=3Dproj/kde-crazy.git;a=3Ds= ummary >=20 > (I doubt that anyone tested it) >=20 > I attached the news item, please review. Meanwhile, I'll create docs > patches. >=20 > Also, I'm CCing hardened as my No.1 question was not answered. Please do. > Thanks >=20 > PS. Please test it News item commited, also added note to KDE guide and proposed note for GNOM= E=20 =46AQ. I didn't find anything relevant about profiles in xorg guide so I sk= ipped=20 it. I'll commit this change this Friday, 26 March @ Docs Team, do you want a handbook patch? I don't think it is needed, but= =20 whatever you say =2D-=20 Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE/Qt Teams blog.tampakrap.gr --nextPart11889548.PjtOcI5h6E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkuo0GEACgkQjDdoMVfcAHhI7QCffcWUKvsAgpaYYbwLoQ/73hrp YUQAn0A0tlHwZ06UdKepwRVJsvKsGoU4 =0CDn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart11889548.PjtOcI5h6E--