From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ntbbz-0000H8-8F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:59:43 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C13D6E0A8C; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:59:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4CBE0A6E for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:59:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2AC467E52; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:59:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty herd: sgml Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:59:18 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.33.1; KDE/4.4.1; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Thomas Sachau References: <4BA613EB.8000308@gentoo.org> <201003211306.17030.vapier@gentoo.org> <4BA68E2F.6080002@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4BA68E2F.6080002@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3300675.yHzebs9KjJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003220259.18739.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 2bf56f65-1fb0-48b6-82d7-fa551efddd8f X-Archives-Hash: 0797e5104afbb337b94d7618a96f6e50 --nextPart3300675.yHzebs9KjJ Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday 21 March 2010 17:22:55 Thomas Sachau wrote: > Am 21.03.2010 18:06, schrieb Mike Frysinger: > > On Sunday 21 March 2010 08:41:15 Thomas Sachau wrote: > >> I see, that the sgml herd seems to be empty for a longer time, so i > >> would like to ask, if someone wants to take that herd and the related > >> ebuilds and bugs over or if we should delete that herd and assign > >> related ebuilds/bugs to m-n. > >=20 > > if someone were to step up, we'd have to undo any changes we just did.= =20 > > why not add m-n to the herd definition. >=20 > What exactly do you suggest? >=20 > My suggestion is to give people some time to join that herd (which had op= en > bugs back from 2006!) for some time and if nothing happens, remove this > unused herd and assign bugs and ebuilds to m-n, so people at least see, > that those ebuilds are not maintained, instead of getting the false > impression of maintainership by an empty herd. deleting logical herds and updating all the xml files takes effort, as does= =20 reverting those changes when someone steps up. from what i can see, there = is=20 no gain doing this. simple mark the herd itself as m-n, update the staffing needs page, and the= n=20 re-assign the bugs to m-n while keeping sgml herd in the cc. =2Dmike --nextPart3300675.yHzebs9KjJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJLpxVGAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBNcYP/2C7/2Sellg9gQ/75X4zKnvs vyKDhYx22u4bE+gAYObsgEjz8xZ14/eaTRKWuTy6PPCMwDYpkYv5wyLu6nHBTggA x+6DTEKtckLVQKeZekdgQckkmcrF+u0n0XrnjKRLi4Xc2pga7+VQKUGRf+fOgEqq arNqRR3wney493nptALW1M/dADfVektXtB+ku9iqjin985PsJJCmeeJF/7TRh1d7 QXc3n4/mTXqIeOg72Zi47dfC8PZkQrSbAoLhEv+4zO8Q3yRjA816UuZJA5PWDvtd alxZsMZEtrCcQO4nIfHy5GJQycTrnEqM9li9AgG0ZwwSwOAOI690TMt3pwHg7vQg mdDkJuR+1yTpWLt4RDEZ7TCg4QmdC4YPrr3Se+K50Kg/rBk1ErOkwsvtij7Mlab2 /pwIc/mlfPLBRJ6lA6lctfyyOVs4u10LDvOLcI/ug/T8s0RbchSTRdy75FktNg2Y TRP63bEUaQjRxJ6I/4IMkTe7DaiNFidfTQz1QsIi/fmK/OwukM6U7d1HWPBAOMqg rnGhdeeXAGiXNi44rjlajZbinZwUqsnH2ZT5UsaSQqUrvOKMvBgVztxY5aXTAYzf qAeph3tnDG08FBUXqGUOZgU1JPlPVzG43PaJSdYExkWDI2DVfnPw0P02vn4/VNnN rJwHDBIEn64Bmxw7YoYC =83SF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3300675.yHzebs9KjJ--