From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NqDqx-000194-V8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:01:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBAFBE093B; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:01:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBAEE08EA for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:01:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF661B4115 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:01:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.966 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.966 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.367, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TvUd+S1kKGyG for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554201B40E9 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:00:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqDqd-0005Bf-0W for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:00:51 +0100 Received: from s0106001f3b27dbf9.mj.shawcable.net ([70.64.209.102]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:00:51 +0100 Received: from dirtyepic by s0106001f3b27dbf9.mj.shawcable.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:00:51 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:03:00 -0600 Message-ID: <20100312170300.013fb8e3@gentoo.org> References: <4B9A936B.3070804@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/0SeGQ+AR28ig_k0bzn8dtGQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s0106001f3b27dbf9.mj.shawcable.net X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: 5c55daf1-bd35-4bfe-ae42-198758e17abe X-Archives-Hash: f849de35fd4a546c5fac6b7ad836c2ba --Sig_/0SeGQ+AR28ig_k0bzn8dtGQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:18:03 +0200 Petteri R=E4ty wrote: > There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording > bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in > question but there's a difference of opinion here: > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D272160#c5 > Let's get agreed on a single approach and I will add a note here: > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/index.html > I naturally support the approach I have been doing as I think the arch > team is the one in charge. I swear there used to be a piece of documentation that said that the final arch on a stabilization bug should be assigned and the maintainer moved to CC. I can't find it any more, but that's probably where this idea came from. It never really made sense to me but I've done it on several occasio= ns. --=20 fonts, by design, by neglect gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 --Sig_/0SeGQ+AR28ig_k0bzn8dtGQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuayCgACgkQiqiDRvmkBmKs1QCeNBgMJiFIqF05n0YBR26jxO4d WmsAnj58PIFss4xpnRC/TMdI86FfFeWD =qXGq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/0SeGQ+AR28ig_k0bzn8dtGQ--