From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NpUwy-0008Cj-LB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:04:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13B8BE0C78; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:04:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rookery.halcy0n.com (rookery.halcy0n.com [69.72.242.50]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839E9E0C71 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by rookery.halcy0n.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1C8C9A5617; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:09:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:09:29 -0500 From: Mark Loeser To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events Message-ID: <20100310230929.GX30005@halcy0n.com> References: <201003100745.21823.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/Rh48Y0bnrojh5Wm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-Archives-Salt: fd2053d6-e55b-4c0d-bbfd-7309c75df1c1 X-Archives-Hash: 8059172306deff83459e35c8af8f23b7 --/Rh48Y0bnrojh5Wm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> said: > So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at least= =20 > if they want calendar access? >=20 > What about those who might think that Google knows enough about them with= =20 > search and the web crawling and database correlation Google does, and=20 > whatever ad serving might leak thru, and object to having a gmail account= =20 > on principle? Then they don't get to see the calendar.... Seriously though, who cares. If it becomes a problem, we can deal with it then. Until that point, use what we have or implement something that's better. --=20 Mark Loeser email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com web - http://www.halcy0n.com --/Rh48Y0bnrojh5Wm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLmCapCRZPokWLroQRAtWyAKCLp8oroguRaPjG665oftjKXo7THgCgzRlk Fmgzz+zFOjON1nisTWj/xjY= =13aF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/Rh48Y0bnrojh5Wm--