From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NpNRD-000117-76 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:03:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E883E0CCE; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:03:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpauth16.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpauth16.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.22]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C69ECE0CBC for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:02:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3011 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2010 15:02:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (94.66.176.240) by smtpauth16.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.22) with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2010 15:02:45 -0000 From: Markos Chandras To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday? Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:02:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.32-zen6; KDE/4.4.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <4B971B38.3070907@gentoo.org> <201003100735.32850.vapier@gentoo.org> <20100310144159.GV30005@halcy0n.com> In-Reply-To: <20100310144159.GV30005@halcy0n.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003101702.39367.hwoarang@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 125eefe0-e0a6-43a8-854e-e2a9e706d840 X-Archives-Hash: f78c146f389fbf0213a33df222301c8b On Wednesday 10 March 2010 16:41:59 Mark Loeser wrote: > Mike Frysinger said: > > On Tuesday 09 March 2010 23:08:24 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > > > We have about 500 bump request open at the moment: > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump > > > > > > I assume that quite a few of them would be no big deal to their > > > maintainers in Gentoo. > > > > > > > > > Bugday is occupying the first Saturday of the month: how about bumpday > > > on the third Saturday of the month? First bumpday could be March 20th, > > > 10 days from now. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > for the maintainer-needed ones, np. for the ones with maintainers, i > > think you need an ack from someone first. > > I don't even think the maintainer-needed ones should be bumped. Who > knows what bugs you are introducing into the tree. This is why things > eventually get treecleaned. I run occasionally the maintainer-needed list and bump those packages ( and YES I try to do proper bumps not just renaming the ebuilds ), so yes maintainer-needed package could get some love as well :) -- Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org