From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NpE27-0008P3-01 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:00:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1328AE0784; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:00:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D44E07BB for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:00:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from angelstorm (cpe-76-93-187-113.san.res.rr.com [76.93.187.113]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D891B4078 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:00:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 21:00:04 -0800 From: Joshua Saddler To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday? Message-ID: <20100309210004.51b15a4e@angelstorm> In-Reply-To: <4B9720D6.6010702@gentoo.org> References: <4B971B38.3070907@gentoo.org> <4B9720D6.6010702@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.18.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/ti+DhlwQtZ1xmFVNa5B1UwU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 174ef17a-e368-413e-b07e-15268202c392 X-Archives-Hash: 1b0e68ed380028e61f2ec093af69d312 --Sig_/ti+DhlwQtZ1xmFVNa5B1UwU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:32:22 -0600 Nathan Zachary wrote: > On 09/03/10 22:08, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > > Hello! > > > > > > We have about 500 bump request open at the moment: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=3Dbump > > > > I assume that quite a few of them would be no big deal to their > > maintainers in Gentoo. > > > > > > Bugday is occupying the first Saturday of the month: how about bumpday > > on the third Saturday of the month? First bumpday could be March 20th, > > 10 days from now. > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > Sebastian > > > > =20 > Not sure that my opinion matters all that much as I'm not currently > doing ebuild work, but I think this idea could really help out the > status of the tree. Attached to it could be a stabilisation day as well. >=20 > --Nathan Zachary The ones that I'm CCed on, either as proxy maintainer or because I have som= e other interest, I prolly would mind. They're not simple revbumps, but the= y have dependency changes and/or other complicated changes, which is the on= ly reason why they're still open. My bugs can't be solved with a simple ren= ame-and-commit. I'm prolly not the only one who feels this way, so you really need to pick = your bugs carefully! Otherwise we'll end up with another screwed-up mess li= ke the one we just went through with patrick. Bumpdays are otherwise a good idea, though I'm not sure why we need a separ= ate day for that in addition to our standard bugdays. --Sig_/ti+DhlwQtZ1xmFVNa5B1UwU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuXJ1cACgkQxPWMzpKk6kO/fQCggFS+cEYV7bTW+SuaTxY5oUOg r48An32cH89hLXFT6IBDaMvmfuGOdmjG =dbRi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ti+DhlwQtZ1xmFVNa5B1UwU--