From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39934-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1NpE27-0008P3-01
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:00:35 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1328AE0784;
	Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:00:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D44E07BB
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:00:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from angelstorm (cpe-76-93-187-113.san.res.rr.com [76.93.187.113])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D891B4078
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:00:09 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 21:00:04 -0800
From: Joshua Saddler <nightmorph@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday?
Message-ID: <20100309210004.51b15a4e@angelstorm>
In-Reply-To: <4B9720D6.6010702@gentoo.org>
References: <4B971B38.3070907@gentoo.org>
	<4B9720D6.6010702@gentoo.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.18.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
 boundary="Sig_/ti+DhlwQtZ1xmFVNa5B1UwU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: 174ef17a-e368-413e-b07e-15268202c392
X-Archives-Hash: 1b0e68ed380028e61f2ec093af69d312

--Sig_/ti+DhlwQtZ1xmFVNa5B1UwU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:32:22 -0600
Nathan Zachary <nathanzachary@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On 09/03/10 22:08, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> >
> > We have about 500 bump request open at the moment:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=3Dbump
> >
> > I assume that quite a few of them would be no big deal to their
> > maintainers in Gentoo.
> >
> >
> > Bugday is occupying the first Saturday of the month: how about bumpday
> > on the third Saturday of the month?  First bumpday could be March 20th,
> > 10 days from now.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> >
> >
> > Sebastian
> >
> >  =20
> Not sure that my opinion matters all that much as I'm not currently
> doing ebuild work, but I think this idea could really help out the
> status of the tree.  Attached to it could be a stabilisation day as well.
>=20
> --Nathan Zachary

The ones that I'm CCed on, either as proxy maintainer or because I have som=
e other interest, I prolly would mind. They're not simple revbumps, but the=
y have dependency changes and/or other complicated changes, which is the on=
ly reason why they're still open. My bugs can't be solved with a simple ren=
ame-and-commit.

I'm prolly not the only one who feels this way, so you really need to pick =
your bugs carefully! Otherwise we'll end up with another screwed-up mess li=
ke the one we just went through with patrick.

Bumpdays are otherwise a good idea, though I'm not sure why we need a separ=
ate day for that in addition to our standard bugdays.

--Sig_/ti+DhlwQtZ1xmFVNa5B1UwU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkuXJ1cACgkQxPWMzpKk6kO/fQCggFS+cEYV7bTW+SuaTxY5oUOg
r48An32cH89hLXFT6IBDaMvmfuGOdmjG
=dbRi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/ti+DhlwQtZ1xmFVNa5B1UwU--