From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NoTTK-0007XC-FT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:17:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22E57E0BC2; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 03:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE09E0BAA for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 03:17:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532EC1B407D for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 03:17:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.967 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.967 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.368, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id htVZN9jNRmsS for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 03:17:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3BD1B4010 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 03:17:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NoTSs-0003bO-4h for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 04:17:06 +0100 Received: from s0106001e378466d7.mj.shawcable.net ([70.64.210.107]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 04:17:06 +0100 Received: from dirtyepic by s0106001e378466d7.mj.shawcable.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 04:17:06 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking bugs for bugday? Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 21:19:22 -0600 Message-ID: <20100307211922.248714b5@gentoo.org> References: <4B889D1F.3040304@gentoo.org> <201003061545.06522.rbu@gentoo.org> <201003061909.29222.levertond@googlemail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/N=4446r8JYaEREUF7UG.cBB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s0106001e378466d7.mj.shawcable.net X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: d6d23dae-4b63-4fd2-bcbb-5e86fe34c374 X-Archives-Hash: 86a68d4ba5361150493a17c84f132d04 --Sig_/N=4446r8JYaEREUF7UG.cBB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 19:09:28 +0000 David Leverton wrote: > On Saturday 06 March 2010 15:26:10 Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: > > Well, I personally would prefer to have two keywords at least, one for > > candidates and another for confirmed bugs. >=20 > This sounds like the sort of thing Bugzilla's "flags" mechanism is for. >=20 > http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/2.22/html/flags-overview.html We've also talked about using flags for arch testing: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213514 --=20 fonts, by design, by neglect gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 --Sig_/N=4446r8JYaEREUF7UG.cBB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuUbL4ACgkQiqiDRvmkBmKCgQCgvQp610DxeHhopkmSqJO0gpHf P8gAoO/5V7e6JR5fHrmm2kowE41v4o7k =3Qcd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/N=4446r8JYaEREUF7UG.cBB--