From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NoFWt-0005GG-VN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:24:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD619E0B72; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:24:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f211.google.com (mail-bw0-f211.google.com [209.85.218.211]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D95E0AD9 for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:23:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so181657bwz.29 for ; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 04:23:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=ay9Ylwoj+4Y7qY7lYTdltCaowhRd69hK8pGcQbQsBxU=; b=GdBFaZSVOw6+UtGChT3MYImBHKFT1JZTQ6ooLnxmwqsnWArJakpfaGBx/nMEQJJPDt gdqIC8XskkYmY2BCqcNd7W6/KUgs31mUL15VwRnz3WJU5t2RbukIFyYrDwwpb8iJk4mX FZpwsxHbYKVSLrlF3KX8Ugtf3R4B0R5R3fzGA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=GIU84dWU5TBblAXFT1eK/cmu0lNxwzDStX5U1g5I9/H8QYUDm86FxictIC6hVcNsxT SNfjb3SMHKUBV6+bE6G4yklxGYR5IV23X9EDJ7t8qerVt6vQ4e6z3y7fvLnL/PRont+J cBjB3uai8o1UpcwC5l/XphNGwvQlylmlLqs5M= Received: by 10.204.33.211 with SMTP id i19mr3187425bkd.127.1267964629164; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 04:23:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from shiny-one.home (host86-176-220-192.range86-176.btcentralplus.com [86.176.220.192]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm11323345bkr.18.2010.03.07.04.23.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 07 Mar 2010 04:23:48 -0800 (PST) From: David Leverton To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking bugs for bugday? Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:23:45 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <4B889D1F.3040304@gentoo.org> <201003061909.29222.levertond@googlemail.com> <4B932BFF.8000709@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4B932BFF.8000709@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201003071223.46440.levertond@googlemail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 17660bec-ea59-46cb-b1b8-7b939d280707 X-Archives-Hash: 268ed360f9ffc540f0eb36c8d39fab92 On Sunday 07 March 2010 04:30:55 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > What I wonder now is: > - Will it work with our very instance of Bugzilla? The security team uses (or at least has used in the past) flags on Gentoo Bugzilla. > - Can certain flag states be required when searching? It looks like you need to use the "Advanced Searching Using Boolean Charts" section on the search page - you can select "Flag", "is equal to", and type the flag name/state, for example "Assigned_To?" for one of the above-mentioned security flags. Note that the "normal" search fields still apply, so you need to deselect all the options in the "Status" list before that particular example will produce any results. > - Can we get their current value out using ctype=rdf output I don't think you can with the RDF, but the "XML" button on the search results page includes the flags (and a whole lot of other information), so if you're going to rewrite the bugday software anyway you could consider using that instead, if it would give sufficient benefit. It seems that if you're requesting it programmatically you'd have to do the search, get the bug IDs and explicitly pass them to the XML generator, though, which makes things a little more awkward.