From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39871-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1No6PA-0001Du-JV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 02:39:44 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 223D9E0BE5; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 02:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1868AE0BC0 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 02:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3171B405A for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 02:39:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed change to savedconfig.eclass Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 21:39:32 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.0 (Linux/2.6.32.6; KDE/4.4.0; x86_64; ; ) References: <20100224180316.660d2c98@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <20100224180316.660d2c98@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2396712.8xou7DNJ2k"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003062139.33162.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: df2601c6-3629-471c-b329-a72e1b0fa2e2 X-Archives-Hash: 7b76a29e2277e929283db3cf22acdaf2 --nextPart2396712.8xou7DNJ2k Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wednesday 24 February 2010 12:03:16 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > If no one objects, I will look forward to committing the patch in a > week or two. commit it already :p -mike --nextPart2396712.8xou7DNJ2k Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJLkxHlAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBa2YQAOG8yNGb7zzS1DK32FXFstEg 60edumeu1ZEmiX+kdo1hnShEc2Wnv4k9eDgwchIMxme+ZksCZdiwT7HcsQ5sAJ6f JkXrygv79ysE10JkF0S/SDmwkWu4d6QQC7bS/T+oDxHGPHrjsGdmpY6bUfYdSaoF Wt4XuceAEZfQGZUC8vzdPz9peE34DTH/wpbej0dYQ1YPmm/2+S2P9RXb3cxqz4GB Wgy7R8IkCf7GHnQH4LtcaD3wNpmeUTvuM3//ut1w47+KKb7fWfT1tIg9EUw2lhwd tzfuVerDVCJhMxrgpupU8i8x0H0MDkQwTC+Fk6PpW1X1zKzDYcZboXrizfJYbvOJ Fz+r5n+UX6xqdC3zct9jsHKQxLViD2rkliojcXcvzCIeMXBVYEm5m1R3d1TgyrIO Q6eUaj4ZEzGF5LnxcDcu3Y4nlH98UcQ9gv/I/4eoRH16c23gvJPjPxGgxXr3iHI3 pD1AhmmtvE4y4LWqUoRVfWqVFTLp2X7+tPRE/c5tzV84QrGNzng7zAfSCAO7m8Yf nQugiKSyn9Pf8d3xOM/gOD6yjgzQVN5YMMotrCx6iLjcHhFnV4W9xahHup8DS0wO 0ND9VwnMhOlmZ2KGy2J7svQyARmk9hK4wRzrK7b1CuH42zgvRTOHO2enE8n/vuw7 wQlbwkKpZr2IwhCg8Kln =ddmz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2396712.8xou7DNJ2k--