From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1No6E7-0007qV-Vo for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 02:28:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E92CE0B44; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 02:28:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B737E0B25 for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 02:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36821B405A; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 02:27:48 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes to flag-o-matic's _filter-var Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 21:27:47 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.0 (Linux/2.6.32.6; KDE/4.4.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: ChIIph References: <4B858BA9.2070300@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4B858BA9.2070300@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2138953.Lb8Rd8aUs2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003062127.48227.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 4d6fcb0f-6e70-47c8-8200-f87bb61318b4 X-Archives-Hash: 1e6872d03eeba2b0bcbd3c1e16c43b0f --nextPart2138953.Lb8Rd8aUs2 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday 24 February 2010 15:27:21 ChIIph wrote: > Here are some minor changes I'd like to propose to flag-o-matic's > _filter-var() to work properly with LDFLAGS. > Without this, things like "-Wl,-O1,--as-needed" won't be affected by any > kind of filter since there are no spaces to separate each flag. >=20 > I don't know of any better way to do this, but here's a patch that works > just fine. the func is used by other code where you dont want to screw with commas. =20 plus, there are a few other ways to trick the system. my opinion is still: - bypassing the system is sometimes useful - use separate -Wl flags and things just work so thanks, but no thanks =2Dmike --nextPart2138953.Lb8Rd8aUs2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJLkw8kAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WB34QQALmaAY0TrLYjQiZvsikKTZz1 RvzJvWfgL7PnAmr9IuSPHngIV37Li2QpI2ariG4dnAf5RICwVV9uNyZhGoe+AVaI NtHKopDYFsENbobzJ5lcci4BARjhHL2I+01mAfX/4CINFcxep0Pf1tX278JCPZ8k hO8GX1L5pifBRBb234NXammg0gQGsTQndclTkfNqND1t0SGEPqp4zTGF/c5r/OeN 3RqzZtBFMXQEzS8Lchs6Pk9jtq7GGjc5pWsmSL1vYihZ9QLUldR/8VBLW/gg7HFt SXfQuXkdZjU7VKfdoy33SerZB51whnydVHB7X5OOhx+iX15SNP82d1zxG5nQCWo8 6OOWSe3ZYIDeGyLhAcswBUbEqUUIFOTcwkuR7TIcyaKHO3V2UHhgKvmpu0NIvJ2P aBA/Pc1Nbftkm+7dUz920cC4vb1JQmmyn+VcdA8FEHG7HnDU2cQKSKlpen6FjwQp MUMQVqbYKfCwG67gNYkMAF6ouFIoVphxQo9fp45qOplYJ6fDrlA331uER2qEFmTf oml3Tw5ov4RwMvkjukk5kF39o3xxVctqLihfZGhG5M1AGnaNtC7VqQS0wCarPm33 uHs40XnYzjwQLU4HWaIHnod2E1AFF7+vAlBTnLS+P09hxXVu6XDRoku/Zq+oHwcn y9KGtGHlAYZiHIDx94/h =v40x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2138953.Lb8Rd8aUs2--