From: Joshua Saddler <nightmorph@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 01:41:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100305014122.1f616392@angelstorm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea2499da1003050110o753382d4if3a4be90723cf39c@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2333 bytes --]
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:10:00 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Because 'stable' denotes that it works as intended, that it can be
> installed easily, etc. All of these are true now for python3. There
> are applications being written for it. We want to package those too.
> I'm fine with people masking it, and maybe we should make that easier
> somehow, but 3.x should definitely be stable.
It does *not* work as intended.
Here, since your selective quoting missed every point I made, lemme make 'em again:
>> Python 3 is a new major version of Python and is intentionally incompatible
>> with Python 2. Many external modules have not been ported yet to Python 3, so
>> currently Python 3.1 should not be set as main active version of Python.
>> Setting Python 3.1 as main active version of Python is currently unsupported.
>> When it will change, a separate news item will be created to notify users.
>So nothing uses it yet, and it's completely incompatible with 90% of the
>numerous python/pygtk apps already on my system, so it'll just sit there,
>SLOTted, doing nothing but taking up more space on my very limited SSD, while
>Python 2.6 is the version that's actually in use by every single app.
Like I said before, like it says *in the news item*, "stuff does not work with it." How does that qualify as "works as intended" when it will not work with all my packages that use Python?
If you believe stabilizing a package should be done in a vacuum, in an idealized world where no other package cares about another, then congrats, you're on the right track.
>> Currently Python 3.1 should *NOT* be set as [the] main active version of
>> Python.
This is in the friggin' news item itself. If it should not be used, then don't force stable users to install it.
> It will *NOT* under this proposal be the default. Please formulate
> more carefully if you want to make an argument.
If it's stable, then users get it by default, assuming they run the stable tree. They install a recent stage3, build their system, run emerge -uD world. Bam, a useless version of Python is now installed. Nothing on their systems will use it, so it's bloat.
> but 3.x should definitely be stable
No one has said yet why this is. So . . . direct question, gimme a direct answer: why?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-05 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-04 18:22 [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-03-04 18:38 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2010-03-23 19:01 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-03-04 21:16 ` Sebastian Pipping
2010-03-04 21:43 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2010-03-04 22:56 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-05 4:59 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2010-03-07 17:11 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mark Loeser
2010-03-07 17:32 ` Samuli Suominen
2010-03-07 18:26 ` Petteri Räty
2010-03-07 20:06 ` Joshua Saddler
2010-03-07 18:25 ` Petteri Räty
2010-03-08 5:38 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2010-03-08 3:08 ` Ryan Hill
2010-03-08 5:00 ` Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
2010-03-08 9:39 ` Matti Bickel
2010-03-08 9:53 ` Antoni Grzymala
2010-03-08 14:23 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter Hjalmarsson
2010-03-08 14:31 ` Petteri Räty
2010-03-05 8:25 ` [gentoo-dev] " Joshua Saddler
2010-03-05 9:10 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2010-03-05 9:41 ` Joshua Saddler [this message]
2010-03-05 9:56 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2010-03-05 10:14 ` Joshua Saddler
2010-03-05 10:22 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2010-03-05 11:09 ` Maciej Mrozowski
2010-03-05 11:24 ` Zac Medico
2010-03-05 12:37 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-05 17:23 ` Alistair Bush
2010-03-05 19:28 ` Andy Kittner
2010-03-05 20:23 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2010-03-05 19:26 ` Duncan
2010-03-06 0:19 ` Zac Medico
2010-03-08 21:28 ` William Hubbs
2010-03-10 17:36 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-03-10 22:43 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-11 0:25 ` William Hubbs
2010-03-11 1:24 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-11 2:34 ` William Hubbs
2010-03-11 5:04 ` Jacob Godserv
2010-03-11 18:32 ` Alec Warner
2010-03-12 20:48 ` Ravi Pinjala
2010-03-05 10:00 ` [gentoo-dev] " Zac Medico
2010-03-10 13:02 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
2010-03-23 19:13 ` [gentoo-dev] " Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-03-23 19:28 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-24 16:43 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-03-24 16:56 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-24 17:23 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-03-24 17:35 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-24 17:37 ` Alec Warner
2010-03-24 17:41 ` Doktor Notor
2010-03-24 17:51 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2010-03-24 18:04 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-03-24 18:28 ` Joshua Saddler
2010-03-24 18:41 ` Richard Freeman
2010-03-24 18:55 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-24 18:57 ` William Hubbs
2010-03-24 16:57 ` Joshua Saddler
2010-03-24 17:14 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-03-24 17:32 ` Joshua Saddler
2010-03-24 17:36 ` Alec Warner
2010-03-24 17:45 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-03-24 17:53 ` Sebastian Beßler
2010-03-24 17:47 ` Jeremy Olexa
2010-03-24 18:03 ` William Hubbs
2010-03-24 19:53 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2010-03-24 19:57 ` [gentoo-dev] " Thomas Sachau
2010-03-24 20:25 ` William Hubbs
2010-03-24 20:36 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-24 21:12 ` William Hubbs
2010-03-25 3:47 ` Joshua Saddler
2010-03-25 15:37 ` Richard Freeman
2010-03-26 9:02 ` Pacho Ramos
2010-03-26 12:10 ` Zac Medico
2010-03-26 12:33 ` Pacho Ramos
2010-03-26 12:35 ` Zac Medico
2010-03-26 15:40 ` Brian Harring
2010-03-26 15:57 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-03-26 16:08 ` Dale
2010-03-26 16:28 ` Alec Warner
2010-03-26 17:27 ` Jeremy Olexa
2010-03-27 17:37 ` William Hubbs
2010-03-26 17:43 ` Dale
2010-03-26 17:53 ` George Prowse
2010-03-26 18:39 ` Dale
2010-03-26 18:48 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2010-03-25 18:34 ` [gentoo-dev] " Roy Bamford
2010-03-25 19:05 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-03-26 7:59 ` Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
2010-03-26 12:21 ` Zac Medico
2010-03-26 14:22 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-03-26 15:43 ` Brian Harring
2010-03-26 16:04 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-03-26 16:15 ` Brian Harring
2010-03-26 16:37 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-03-24 21:22 ` Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
2010-03-23 19:57 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jonathan Callen
2010-03-24 17:58 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100305014122.1f616392@angelstorm \
--to=nightmorph@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox