From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nlj0Y-0001PC-4f for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 13:16:30 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CC43E08D5; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 13:15:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f222.google.com (mail-ew0-f222.google.com [209.85.219.222]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C44E0860 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 13:15:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so1032799ewy.26 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 05:15:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.102.75 with SMTP id f11mr2135146ebo.79.1267362931274; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 05:15:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from atum.lan (0x5da33326.cpe.ge-0-1-0-1104.soebnqu1.customer.tele.dk [93.163.51.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm7306013eye.5.2010.02.28.05.15.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 28 Feb 2010 05:15:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:15:24 +0100 From: Alexander =?iso-8859-1?B?RuZy+Hk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Marking bugs for bugday? Message-ID: <20100228131524.GA34366@atum.lan> References: <4B889D1F.3040304@gentoo.org> <20100227162232.GB1733@halcy0n.com> <4B8958B1.4020706@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B8958B1.4020706@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: 245d8dd1-0b4a-4424-91a7-ac4d0942b0f9 X-Archives-Hash: 7a144ecd92bc1648e800b6a7d22ae7cd --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 06:38:57PM +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > bugday.gentoo.org could still be used as an entry point showing these bug= s. http://bugday.gentoo.org/ would easily be made able to show bugs with a specific Bugzilla keyword only. If I recall correctly, we had to do some very naughty things back when Gentoo changed the Bugzilla system to run with a MySQL cluster as backend. Back in the early days of Bugday, the site queried the database directly, but these days it uses Bugzilla's XML API for all the requests, which is why it takes forever to load the page. We did spend one Bugday making it a bit faster though, but it's still not fast enough (yes, it was even worse before that). A rewrite with a cache would probably not be a bad idea and it would be an easy task for any user who wants to contribute with something useful :) Until then, it would probably be a good idea to clean up the ACL of http://bugday.gentoo.org/. I'm still able to log in using my ancient username and password, and I can see on the accesslist that there are multiple former developers who still has access to the site. --=20 Alexander F=E6r=F8y --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLimxsAAoJEPm8L+IrCM6PS8sQAJrXYWgd7YQfmkmZOC1daf2L cXl2Sx85FfkX7EPdXuLR2QO7nRfOv4uBDAYaTTGTJYVF/pUf+cbJBSOKSPIMHrZP yMiKJeYcaZNDYBEo9T6CZYJkEC4R4QtdKWZvPNKBI8osxCNBC+ZOXqsfqAVnSOMQ Eu4CayrFmsSuBCqwWXsbS4VFChzVwyohOOa9fapAIE3Uqt0XjBsY1iJK7HWGeLSH d7ULsfDsBW7a1i36sY2R/cHG+dGDKcAVtiN02HtObAR6eGf21XvAyxU+ga+VW684 B2b5h8Mo6o4xQkP4V+J6o1jEFMs2HFBMKmJWaoaM32hcPiJhC0EXou79tmUyMD4m PznlTJdvD/Kr4QZOLp0ISSJdPfzKQ9ypJNsVu7rKK6BacYCGzJ18UHN5JFd7eBJg 7xy1UR7xUsP3w2rVGhQBT0CnwLLhJ4rn4IlgPnSQ6Jc1P4f/VhSpz/hi+cFWA8MX PON3iiHC9jiyf2SriCctWXfcvRlXSLuXw1uTw6hRY7o59aF9GYjSIHBFtgpxweUA udiAwUIJ6JQ+rZkrFqnPmJN9BkcQvd7vPHq4YSz8lgBqypgTrfQ6tssiIMrs+4yE jjPzcnYRalqOsrW3fPQ572i+TVN2qXkI+Z77RaNDqUj3mvfMyAnQLeLLtgtAL4qK 9b8y0yCpmNAt8oT9eWa1 =BgNg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24--