From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NlWts-0007LN-5G for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 00:20:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3823FE081A; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 00:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDE9E064A for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 00:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5FA1B40FA for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 00:20:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.271 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.271 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.161, BAYES_05=-1.11] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ae8ySKahDM1B for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 00:20:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660266470A for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 00:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlWtN-0000gr-Be for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 01:20:17 +0100 Received: from s0106001e378466d7.mj.shawcable.net ([70.64.210.107]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 01:20:17 +0100 Received: from dirtyepic by s0106001e378466d7.mj.shawcable.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 01:20:17 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking bugs for bugday? Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:22:24 -0600 Message-ID: <20100227182224.37f713a6@gentoo.org> References: <4B889D1F.3040304@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/yV2Pe7aHIFW2GABuM/r+nwZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s0106001e378466d7.mj.shawcable.net X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: af88941c-936a-4d4c-84b1-e53ade5939c8 X-Archives-Hash: 761185d616427239d4ff6420c5d68a99 --Sig_/yV2Pe7aHIFW2GABuM/r+nwZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 05:18:39 +0100 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > I'm surprised that there is no keyword in Gentoo's bugzilla [1] to mark > bugs for bugday. Is there a good reason why such a keyword does not > exist? Would it be hard to set up? I would use it. I honestly didn't know we still did bugdays. :/ --=20 fonts, by design, by neglect gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 --Sig_/yV2Pe7aHIFW2GABuM/r+nwZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuJt0QACgkQiqiDRvmkBmJolwCgn+CX3dW4bDuENC9tU8i3DSpZ Y04AoKXgddGWrSIvx1MZkgR9d9B58qzW =RLjH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/yV2Pe7aHIFW2GABuM/r+nwZ--