From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NlI5u-0004Fk-Vx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 08:32:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22E64E09E9; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 08:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f222.google.com (mail-ew0-f222.google.com [209.85.219.222]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEEC3E09C6 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 08:31:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so513845ewy.26 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:31:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=EZpK2AN9iu9IUV+MGQpqMNTT2bB5flGi81jABrkZCHs=; b=V+/xpp8GEwS08tEl3009YrkTpCRW1jPgH/zGpS+blo2KulR1FUt1kiYLCV2J7mePFZ kAr8O0PiV4rW51mp9C/LY2phZw7zN6UvB3TKIzegF+M0EINcg5ppGxLyFU+Kw8ElDsws B2pSkEdE4S4Zf9ymGkJprr3sEl+xEqgtsxgts= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=hwVJmlxY9y3IW2fX5TQtAHPpkuScwILxx+4nX7gftzCFWIY1VnqwzxYtLeW7TBzddW 3hH0kMELrklu1pH6zCI2FR5PXrl9d0OxsTGjhYdQaEfVEC3OFkPzxtq1O/M2do9bRkZD NkvS+EchFbNzzfoX5uk11vJZAB4oE7Cwg6ZP8= Received: by 10.213.53.71 with SMTP id l7mr712747ebg.10.1267259501253; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:31:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowmobile ([78.144.74.203]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm530202ewy.6.2010.02.27.00.31.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:31:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 08:31:30 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/zzuf: ChangeLog zzuf-0.13.ebuild Message-ID: <20100227083130.77a0f33f@snowmobile> In-Reply-To: <4B884FC0.5090205@gentoo.org> References: <4B8836EA.5040104@gentoo.org> <4B884FC0.5090205@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.18.5; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/e.6Z0vUUOL7o9PQkXzxPSIh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: eb05dd54-8002-4e67-bc8a-9ba1728e3a3c X-Archives-Hash: 30bc3b09e735357ebf736d8a99e34eb7 --Sig_/e.6Z0vUUOL7o9PQkXzxPSIh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:48:32 +0100 Patrick Lauer wrote: > And I'd appreciate it if PMS would stop refusing to document FEATURES. > (Double negative? I mean: PMS should document reality) PMS does document reality: FEATURES can't be used by ebuilds since its values aren't reliable. Tests have to be made for the thing that actually causes the problem, not a variable that indicates that the user requested but may not have been given the thing that causes the problem. But then, we've had this discussion before, and you already know that, so you're just trying to stir up trouble again. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/e.6Z0vUUOL7o9PQkXzxPSIh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuI2GUACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGa4gCg0Gg7tuU1fNimLzXOptSJKpyS KFMAoN0cxxuPxGKIU/NT4Oy0cAonFma3 =8GF4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/e.6Z0vUUOL7o9PQkXzxPSIh--