* [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles @ 2010-02-11 15:54 Torsten Veller 2010-02-11 16:06 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Torsten Veller @ 2010-02-11 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in profiles/profiles.desc? The ~150 mips development profiles increase the time for a `repoman -d full` run in dev-perl/ from three to five minutes. That is an increase of roughly 66 percent. repoman further prints more than 2000 lines of output for two keywording problems. I can't remember any serious mips keywording activity in the last years. I don't see why I should spend any more time on checking their profiles and filing bugs for an unactive team. Open KEYWORDREQ bugs: https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=kw%3AKEYWORDREQ+owner%2Ccc%3Amips%40gentoo.org ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles 2010-02-11 15:54 [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles Torsten Veller @ 2010-02-11 16:06 ` Christian Faulhammer 2010-02-11 18:41 ` [gentoo-dev] " Brian Harring 2010-02-25 10:30 ` Torsten Veller 2 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Christian Faulhammer @ 2010-02-11 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw To: Gentoo Development [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 416 bytes --] Hi, Torsten Veller <tove@gentoo.org>: > Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in > profiles/profiles.desc? Agreement here. Maybe a restart on non-obsolete MIPS hardware (read Loongson instead of SGI) would be great. V-Li -- Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project <URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode <URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/> [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles 2010-02-11 15:54 [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles Torsten Veller 2010-02-11 16:06 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer @ 2010-02-11 18:41 ` Brian Harring 2010-02-11 18:56 ` Jeremy Olexa 2010-02-25 10:30 ` Torsten Veller 2 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Brian Harring @ 2010-02-11 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1436 bytes --] On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 04:54:38PM +0100, Torsten Veller wrote: > Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in > profiles/profiles.desc? > > > The ~150 mips development profiles increase the time for a > `repoman -d full` run in dev-perl/ from three to five minutes. That is > an increase of roughly 66 percent. > repoman further prints more than 2000 lines of output for two keywording > problems. Quick pcheck visibility scan of the full tree, stats follow: mips profiles still enabled: * 116191 seperate dependency issues, 1 line per profile/dependency issue * roughly 2m39s run time mips profiles disabled (leaving mips-irix however) * 9550 seperate dependency issues, 1 line per profile/dependency issue * roughly 1m54s run time. So... mips accounts for about 30% of the pcheck runtime, and *92%* of known visibility issues. As for the runtime difference between pcheck/repoman, pcheck has some tricks internally to reduce the # of profiles it has to scan down to just the unique USE/mask set- I'd expect the mips impact to be far larger w/out that trick in place. At the very least if it's going to be kept around, experimental or not, the number of profiles in use there *really* needs reduction- mips has roughly 117 profiles listed in profiles.desc out of 217- literally ~54% of all dev/stable/experimental profiles. Either way, stats to chew on. ~harring [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles 2010-02-11 18:41 ` [gentoo-dev] " Brian Harring @ 2010-02-11 18:56 ` Jeremy Olexa 2010-02-11 19:08 ` Brian Harring ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Jeremy Olexa @ 2010-02-11 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:41:41 -0800, Brian Harring <ferringb@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 04:54:38PM +0100, Torsten Veller wrote: >> Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in >> profiles/profiles.desc? >> >> >> The ~150 mips development profiles increase the time for a >> `repoman -d full` run in dev-perl/ from three to five minutes. That is >> an increase of roughly 66 percent. >> repoman further prints more than 2000 lines of output for two keywording >> problems. > > Quick pcheck visibility scan of the full tree, stats follow: > > mips profiles still enabled: > * 116191 seperate dependency issues, 1 line per profile/dependency > issue > * roughly 2m39s run time > > mips profiles disabled (leaving mips-irix however) > * 9550 seperate dependency issues, 1 line per profile/dependency issue > * roughly 1m54s run time. > > So... mips accounts for about 30% of the pcheck runtime, and *92%* of > known visibility issues. As for the runtime difference between > pcheck/repoman, pcheck has some tricks internally to reduce the # of > profiles it has to scan down to just the unique USE/mask set- I'd > expect the mips impact to be far larger w/out that trick in place. > > At the very least if it's going to be kept around, experimental or > not, the number of profiles in use there *really* needs reduction- > mips has roughly 117 profiles listed in profiles.desc out of 217- > literally ~54% of all dev/stable/experimental profiles. I agree, I wasn't sure why so many profiles were added[1] for a dead team (for all intensive purposes). Seems quite silly to me to leave them as 'dev' status. If a member of the mips team would reply to this thread, that would be good. (and surprising to me :) I would guess that it would be far easier to work in an overlay at this point. I would also guess that if there are ANY mips users out there that they would have to use some other ACCEPT_KEYWORDS value because the shape of ~mips is so...bad. -Jeremy [1]: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/profiles.desc?r1=1.151&r2=1.152 > > Either way, stats to chew on. > ~harring ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles 2010-02-11 18:56 ` Jeremy Olexa @ 2010-02-11 19:08 ` Brian Harring 2010-02-11 19:16 ` Brian Harring ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Brian Harring @ 2010-02-11 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 598 bytes --] On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 06:56:58PM +0000, Jeremy Olexa wrote: > I would guess that it would be far easier to work in an overlay at this > point. I would also guess that if there are ANY mips users out there that > they would have to use some other ACCEPT_KEYWORDS value because the shape > of ~mips is so...bad. Might want to wait till the cvs->git transition occurs, assuming it's in the next few months- primarily, preserve history, they can just fork the tree off and mainline can start pruning. Till then the profiles could pretty easily be disabled if folks wanted. ~harring [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles 2010-02-11 18:56 ` Jeremy Olexa 2010-02-11 19:08 ` Brian Harring @ 2010-02-11 19:16 ` Brian Harring 2010-02-11 19:21 ` Samuli Suominen 2010-02-11 21:12 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer 3 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Brian Harring @ 2010-02-11 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 518 bytes --] On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 06:56:58PM +0000, Jeremy Olexa wrote: > > At the very least if it's going to be kept around, experimental or > > not, the number of profiles in use there *really* needs reduction- > > mips has roughly 117 profiles listed in profiles.desc out of 217- > > literally ~54% of all dev/stable/experimental profiles. Correction also- they've got 154 rather than 117, meaning 71% of all profiles for a scan. Not sure how I screwed that number up, but aparently I managed it. ~harring [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles 2010-02-11 18:56 ` Jeremy Olexa 2010-02-11 19:08 ` Brian Harring 2010-02-11 19:16 ` Brian Harring @ 2010-02-11 19:21 ` Samuli Suominen 2010-02-11 21:12 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer 3 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Samuli Suominen @ 2010-02-11 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev On 02/11/2010 08:56 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: >>> Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in >>> profiles/profiles.desc? >>> The ~150 mips development profiles increase the time for a >>> `repoman -d full` run in dev-perl/ from three to five minutes. That is >>> an increase of roughly 66 percent. >>> repoman further prints more than 2000 lines of output for two > keywording >>> problems. >> >> Quick pcheck visibility scan of the full tree, stats follow: >> >> mips profiles still enabled: >> * 116191 seperate dependency issues, 1 line per profile/dependency >> issue >> * roughly 2m39s run time >> >> mips profiles disabled (leaving mips-irix however) >> * 9550 seperate dependency issues, 1 line per profile/dependency issue >> * roughly 1m54s run time. [ .. ] > > [1]: > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/profiles.desc?r1=1.151&r2=1.152 We could at least delete the server/desktop/developer profiles from the above list right away, not really required to have them for every machine type IMHO ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles 2010-02-11 18:56 ` Jeremy Olexa ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2010-02-11 19:21 ` Samuli Suominen @ 2010-02-11 21:12 ` Christian Faulhammer 2010-02-11 21:22 ` Brian Harring 3 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Christian Faulhammer @ 2010-02-11 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw To: Gentoo Development [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 620 bytes --] Hi, Jeremy Olexa <darkside@gentoo.org>: > I would guess that it would be far easier to work in an overlay at > this point. I would also guess that if there are ANY mips users out > there that they would have to use some other ACCEPT_KEYWORDS value > because the shape of ~mips is so...bad. Don't remove an architecture. Ask vapier what it means to reintroduce it. Even if it rots, mark it as unmaintained and wait for someone to pick-up. V-Li -- Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project <URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode <URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/> [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles 2010-02-11 21:12 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer @ 2010-02-11 21:22 ` Brian Harring 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Brian Harring @ 2010-02-11 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 757 bytes --] On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:12:44PM +0100, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Hi, > > Jeremy Olexa <darkside@gentoo.org>: > > I would guess that it would be far easier to work in an overlay at > > this point. I would also guess that if there are ANY mips users out > > there that they would have to use some other ACCEPT_KEYWORDS value > > because the shape of ~mips is so...bad. > > Don't remove an architecture. Ask vapier what it means to reintroduce > it. Even if it rots, mark it as unmaintained and wait for someone to > pick-up. I question if this will hold true when gentoo-x86 goes git; at the very least folding an arch back into mainline should be a helluva lot easier. Anyone got any comments on similar attempts? ~harring [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles 2010-02-11 15:54 [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles Torsten Veller 2010-02-11 16:06 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer 2010-02-11 18:41 ` [gentoo-dev] " Brian Harring @ 2010-02-25 10:30 ` Torsten Veller 2010-02-25 15:14 ` Mark Loeser 2010-02-25 23:57 ` Ryan Hill 2 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Torsten Veller @ 2010-02-25 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: mips * Torsten Veller <tove@gentoo.org>: > Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in > profiles/profiles.desc? Based on the current feedback I'll change it not earlier than friday next week if nobody objects. -- Thanks ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles 2010-02-25 10:30 ` Torsten Veller @ 2010-02-25 15:14 ` Mark Loeser 2010-02-25 15:24 ` Samuli Suominen 2010-02-25 23:57 ` Ryan Hill 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Mark Loeser @ 2010-02-25 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev, mips Torsten Veller <ml-en@veller.net> said: > * Torsten Veller <tove@gentoo.org>: > > Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in > > profiles/profiles.desc? > > Based on the current feedback I'll change it not earlier than friday > next week if nobody objects. That would be nice. I'd also love to know why we need about 150 different profiles for MIPS... -- Mark Loeser email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com web - http://www.halcy0n.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles 2010-02-25 15:14 ` Mark Loeser @ 2010-02-25 15:24 ` Samuli Suominen 2010-02-25 19:29 ` Robin H. Johnson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Samuli Suominen @ 2010-02-25 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 690 bytes --] On 02/25/2010 05:14 PM, Mark Loeser wrote: > Torsten Veller <ml-en@veller.net> said: >> * Torsten Veller <tove@gentoo.org>: >>> Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in >>> profiles/profiles.desc? >> >> Based on the current feedback I'll change it not earlier than friday >> next week if nobody objects. > > That would be nice. I'd also love to know why we need about 150 > different profiles for MIPS... > Every machine type profile has a developer, desktop and server sub profile. How about deleting those? If you are capable of setting up a Gentoo/MIPS setup, then you are certainly capable of setting up few profile defaults on your own too. See attached patch [-- Attachment #2: profiles.desc.patch --] [-- Type: text/plain, Size: 13247 bytes --] --- profiles.desc.orig 2010-02-25 17:19:46.000000000 +0200 +++ profiles.desc 2010-02-25 17:21:34.000000000 +0200 @@ -44,158 +44,41 @@ m68k default/linux/m68k/10.0/server dev # MIPS Profiles -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/n32/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/n32/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/n32/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/n32 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/n64/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/n64/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/n64/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/n64 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/n32/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/n32/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/n32/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/n32 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/n64/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/n64/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/n64/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/n64 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/n32/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/n32/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/n32/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/n32 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/n64/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/n64/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/n64/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/n64 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/server dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/n32/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/n32/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/n32/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/n32 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/n64/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/n64/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/n64/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/n64 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/server dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/n32/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/n32/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/n32/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/n32 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/n64/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/n64/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/n64/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/n64 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/n32/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/n32/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/n32/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/n32 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/n64/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/n64/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/n64/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/n64 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/n32/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/n32/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/n32/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/n32 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/n64/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/n64/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/n64/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/n64 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/server dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/n32/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/n32/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/n32/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/n32 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/n64/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/n64/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/n64/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/n64 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/n32/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/n32/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/n32/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/n32 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/n64/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/n64/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/n64/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/n64 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/n32/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/n32/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/n32/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/n32 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/n64/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/n64/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/n64/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/n64 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/n32/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/n32/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/n32/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/n32 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/n64/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/n64/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/n64/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/n64 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/n32/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/n32/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/n32/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/n32 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/n64/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/n64/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/n64/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/n64 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/n32/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/n32/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/n32/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/n32 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/n64/desktop dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/n64/developer dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/n64/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/n64 dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k dev -mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/server dev mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32 dev # PPC32 Profiles ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles 2010-02-25 15:24 ` Samuli Suominen @ 2010-02-25 19:29 ` Robin H. Johnson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Robin H. Johnson @ 2010-02-25 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 895 bytes --] On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 05:24:25PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: > Every machine type profile has a developer, desktop and server sub profile. > > How about deleting those? If you are capable of setting up a Gentoo/MIPS > setup, then you are certainly capable of setting up few profile defaults > on your own too. Or better yet, you can stack your own mix of profiles: # rm /etc/make.profile # mkdir /etc/make.profile # cat >/etc/make.profile/parent <<EOF /usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/n32 /usr/portage/profiles/targets/developer EOF This avoids the need for desktop/developer/server everywhere, as I'm not aware of ANY end profile of those that applies any other changes. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 330 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles 2010-02-25 10:30 ` Torsten Veller 2010-02-25 15:14 ` Mark Loeser @ 2010-02-25 23:57 ` Ryan Hill 2010-02-26 6:57 ` Torsten Veller 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Ryan Hill @ 2010-02-25 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 596 bytes --] On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:30:32 +0100 Torsten Veller <ml-en@veller.net> wrote: > * Torsten Veller <tove@gentoo.org>: > > Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in > > profiles/profiles.desc? > > Based on the current feedback I'll change it not earlier than friday > next week if nobody objects. Did you get feedback from anyone on mips@? -- fonts, by design, by neglect gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles 2010-02-25 23:57 ` Ryan Hill @ 2010-02-26 6:57 ` Torsten Veller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Torsten Veller @ 2010-02-26 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev * Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org>: > Torsten Veller <ml-en@veller.net> wrote: > > * Torsten Veller <tove@gentoo.org>: > > > Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in > > > profiles/profiles.desc? > > > > Based on the current feedback I'll change it not earlier than friday > > next week if nobody objects. > > Did you get feedback from anyone on mips@? No, I don't think so. Nonetheless mips was CC'ed on the last mail. I also got no reply to the keywording bugs waiting for mips. -- Thanks ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-26 6:58 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-02-11 15:54 [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles Torsten Veller 2010-02-11 16:06 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer 2010-02-11 18:41 ` [gentoo-dev] " Brian Harring 2010-02-11 18:56 ` Jeremy Olexa 2010-02-11 19:08 ` Brian Harring 2010-02-11 19:16 ` Brian Harring 2010-02-11 19:21 ` Samuli Suominen 2010-02-11 21:12 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer 2010-02-11 21:22 ` Brian Harring 2010-02-25 10:30 ` Torsten Veller 2010-02-25 15:14 ` Mark Loeser 2010-02-25 15:24 ` Samuli Suominen 2010-02-25 19:29 ` Robin H. Johnson 2010-02-25 23:57 ` Ryan Hill 2010-02-26 6:57 ` Torsten Veller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox