From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NiFXC-0001oL-7j for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:11:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F4117E09B3; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (ey-out-1920.google.com [74.125.78.150]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073FFE052E for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so1844123eyg.40 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:11:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=VvE5TXY+95RCoePf8+F6JdjpLi2al6lIS9bHsUj6oZY=; b=AIh19KR9fZz93rTHqwYtT3ubeqtkDedgSmJaVJ0F2ociKwUPa+zy0WhHDgBpay9IWO LeAzYHfQfaBbL7XmIa3Lo/nl5FKPkU+sL17m6InThcSuru+kKJghN4wEBY0HgG4W9nTB hoSrTbOizWAMkXQUImQzi28ZQ/fiEHcxiGyAo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=o+1IJgxTMStSt1TaVTCqmbo/GVv4r1HgagkKtnQxdsA6KAbWqmYvSD7aBTDpgUMt8Z NQvz+vfydp2unGmMoSG29O4ja09S1egI/ra0YimIde0lQXhd8gWTLpypQ/jlAU/DFhNV KNAs2C6kYzI7Ltbp669vyFcBP5LYRklOSVlq4= Received: by 10.213.109.91 with SMTP id i27mr1733482ebp.3.1266534703447; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:11:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from shiny-one.home (host86-180-104-245.range86-180.btcentralplus.com [86.180.104.245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm4251112eya.19.2010.02.18.15.11.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:11:42 -0800 (PST) From: David Leverton To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New eclass for x11 packages Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:11:37 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <4B7DC046.7010001@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4B7DC046.7010001@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201002182311.38065.levertond@googlemail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 29bb986f-393b-4c9d-a655-eb2f6f552432 X-Archives-Hash: 160eab926d4d50177c75c70f7219755d On Thursday 18 February 2010 22:33:42 Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 Chv=C3=A1tal wrote: > [[ ${PN} =3D=3D util-macros ]] || DEPEND+=3D" >=3Dx11-misc/util-macros-1.= 3.0" > [[ ${PN} =3D=3D font-util ]] || DEPEND+=3D" >=3Dmedia-fonts/font-util-1.1= =2E1-r1" Do non-fonts really need font-util there? Looks like that sets up a nice=20 circular dependency. > [[ -e "./configure.ac" ]] && eautoreconf || ewarn "Unable to autoreconf= =20 the configure script. Things may fail." That'll ewarn if configure.ac doesn't exist at all. Doesn't eautoreconf di= e=20 anyway if it fails, and if not, is it a good idea for failures to only give= a=20 warning?