* [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles
@ 2010-02-11 15:54 Torsten Veller
2010-02-11 16:06 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Torsten Veller @ 2010-02-11 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in
profiles/profiles.desc?
The ~150 mips development profiles increase the time for a
`repoman -d full` run in dev-perl/ from three to five minutes. That is
an increase of roughly 66 percent.
repoman further prints more than 2000 lines of output for two keywording
problems.
I can't remember any serious mips keywording activity in the last years.
I don't see why I should spend any more time on checking their profiles
and filing bugs for an unactive team.
Open KEYWORDREQ bugs:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=kw%3AKEYWORDREQ+owner%2Ccc%3Amips%40gentoo.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles
2010-02-11 15:54 [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles Torsten Veller
@ 2010-02-11 16:06 ` Christian Faulhammer
2010-02-11 18:41 ` [gentoo-dev] " Brian Harring
2010-02-25 10:30 ` Torsten Veller
2 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Christian Faulhammer @ 2010-02-11 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Gentoo Development
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 416 bytes --]
Hi,
Torsten Veller <tove@gentoo.org>:
> Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in
> profiles/profiles.desc?
Agreement here. Maybe a restart on non-obsolete MIPS hardware (read
Loongson instead of SGI) would be great.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
<URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles
2010-02-11 15:54 [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles Torsten Veller
2010-02-11 16:06 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
@ 2010-02-11 18:41 ` Brian Harring
2010-02-11 18:56 ` Jeremy Olexa
2010-02-25 10:30 ` Torsten Veller
2 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Brian Harring @ 2010-02-11 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1436 bytes --]
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 04:54:38PM +0100, Torsten Veller wrote:
> Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in
> profiles/profiles.desc?
>
>
> The ~150 mips development profiles increase the time for a
> `repoman -d full` run in dev-perl/ from three to five minutes. That is
> an increase of roughly 66 percent.
> repoman further prints more than 2000 lines of output for two keywording
> problems.
Quick pcheck visibility scan of the full tree, stats follow:
mips profiles still enabled:
* 116191 seperate dependency issues, 1 line per profile/dependency
issue
* roughly 2m39s run time
mips profiles disabled (leaving mips-irix however)
* 9550 seperate dependency issues, 1 line per profile/dependency issue
* roughly 1m54s run time.
So... mips accounts for about 30% of the pcheck runtime, and *92%* of
known visibility issues. As for the runtime difference between
pcheck/repoman, pcheck has some tricks internally to reduce the # of
profiles it has to scan down to just the unique USE/mask set- I'd
expect the mips impact to be far larger w/out that trick in place.
At the very least if it's going to be kept around, experimental or
not, the number of profiles in use there *really* needs reduction-
mips has roughly 117 profiles listed in profiles.desc out of 217-
literally ~54% of all dev/stable/experimental profiles.
Either way, stats to chew on.
~harring
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles
2010-02-11 18:41 ` [gentoo-dev] " Brian Harring
@ 2010-02-11 18:56 ` Jeremy Olexa
2010-02-11 19:08 ` Brian Harring
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Olexa @ 2010-02-11 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:41:41 -0800, Brian Harring <ferringb@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 04:54:38PM +0100, Torsten Veller wrote:
>> Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in
>> profiles/profiles.desc?
>>
>>
>> The ~150 mips development profiles increase the time for a
>> `repoman -d full` run in dev-perl/ from three to five minutes. That is
>> an increase of roughly 66 percent.
>> repoman further prints more than 2000 lines of output for two
keywording
>> problems.
>
> Quick pcheck visibility scan of the full tree, stats follow:
>
> mips profiles still enabled:
> * 116191 seperate dependency issues, 1 line per profile/dependency
> issue
> * roughly 2m39s run time
>
> mips profiles disabled (leaving mips-irix however)
> * 9550 seperate dependency issues, 1 line per profile/dependency issue
> * roughly 1m54s run time.
>
> So... mips accounts for about 30% of the pcheck runtime, and *92%* of
> known visibility issues. As for the runtime difference between
> pcheck/repoman, pcheck has some tricks internally to reduce the # of
> profiles it has to scan down to just the unique USE/mask set- I'd
> expect the mips impact to be far larger w/out that trick in place.
>
> At the very least if it's going to be kept around, experimental or
> not, the number of profiles in use there *really* needs reduction-
> mips has roughly 117 profiles listed in profiles.desc out of 217-
> literally ~54% of all dev/stable/experimental profiles.
I agree, I wasn't sure why so many profiles were added[1] for a dead team
(for all intensive purposes). Seems quite silly to me to leave them as
'dev' status. If a member of the mips team would reply to this thread, that
would be good. (and surprising to me :)
I would guess that it would be far easier to work in an overlay at this
point. I would also guess that if there are ANY mips users out there that
they would have to use some other ACCEPT_KEYWORDS value because the shape
of ~mips is so...bad.
-Jeremy
[1]:
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/profiles.desc?r1=1.151&r2=1.152
>
> Either way, stats to chew on.
> ~harring
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles
2010-02-11 18:56 ` Jeremy Olexa
@ 2010-02-11 19:08 ` Brian Harring
2010-02-11 19:16 ` Brian Harring
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Brian Harring @ 2010-02-11 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 598 bytes --]
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 06:56:58PM +0000, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> I would guess that it would be far easier to work in an overlay at this
> point. I would also guess that if there are ANY mips users out there that
> they would have to use some other ACCEPT_KEYWORDS value because the shape
> of ~mips is so...bad.
Might want to wait till the cvs->git transition occurs, assuming it's
in the next few months- primarily, preserve history, they can just
fork the tree off and mainline can start pruning.
Till then the profiles could pretty easily be disabled if folks
wanted.
~harring
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles
2010-02-11 18:56 ` Jeremy Olexa
2010-02-11 19:08 ` Brian Harring
@ 2010-02-11 19:16 ` Brian Harring
2010-02-11 19:21 ` Samuli Suominen
2010-02-11 21:12 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
3 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Brian Harring @ 2010-02-11 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 518 bytes --]
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 06:56:58PM +0000, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> > At the very least if it's going to be kept around, experimental or
> > not, the number of profiles in use there *really* needs reduction-
> > mips has roughly 117 profiles listed in profiles.desc out of 217-
> > literally ~54% of all dev/stable/experimental profiles.
Correction also- they've got 154 rather than 117, meaning 71% of
all profiles for a scan.
Not sure how I screwed that number up, but aparently I managed it.
~harring
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles
2010-02-11 18:56 ` Jeremy Olexa
2010-02-11 19:08 ` Brian Harring
2010-02-11 19:16 ` Brian Harring
@ 2010-02-11 19:21 ` Samuli Suominen
2010-02-11 21:12 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
3 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Samuli Suominen @ 2010-02-11 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On 02/11/2010 08:56 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>>> Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in
>>> profiles/profiles.desc?
>>> The ~150 mips development profiles increase the time for a
>>> `repoman -d full` run in dev-perl/ from three to five minutes. That is
>>> an increase of roughly 66 percent.
>>> repoman further prints more than 2000 lines of output for two
> keywording
>>> problems.
>>
>> Quick pcheck visibility scan of the full tree, stats follow:
>>
>> mips profiles still enabled:
>> * 116191 seperate dependency issues, 1 line per profile/dependency
>> issue
>> * roughly 2m39s run time
>>
>> mips profiles disabled (leaving mips-irix however)
>> * 9550 seperate dependency issues, 1 line per profile/dependency issue
>> * roughly 1m54s run time.
[ .. ]
>
> [1]:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/profiles.desc?r1=1.151&r2=1.152
We could at least delete the server/desktop/developer profiles from the
above list right away, not really required to have them for every
machine type IMHO
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles
2010-02-11 18:56 ` Jeremy Olexa
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-11 19:21 ` Samuli Suominen
@ 2010-02-11 21:12 ` Christian Faulhammer
2010-02-11 21:22 ` Brian Harring
3 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Christian Faulhammer @ 2010-02-11 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Gentoo Development
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 620 bytes --]
Hi,
Jeremy Olexa <darkside@gentoo.org>:
> I would guess that it would be far easier to work in an overlay at
> this point. I would also guess that if there are ANY mips users out
> there that they would have to use some other ACCEPT_KEYWORDS value
> because the shape of ~mips is so...bad.
Don't remove an architecture. Ask vapier what it means to reintroduce
it. Even if it rots, mark it as unmaintained and wait for someone to
pick-up.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
<URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles
2010-02-11 21:12 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
@ 2010-02-11 21:22 ` Brian Harring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Brian Harring @ 2010-02-11 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 757 bytes --]
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:12:44PM +0100, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jeremy Olexa <darkside@gentoo.org>:
> > I would guess that it would be far easier to work in an overlay at
> > this point. I would also guess that if there are ANY mips users out
> > there that they would have to use some other ACCEPT_KEYWORDS value
> > because the shape of ~mips is so...bad.
>
> Don't remove an architecture. Ask vapier what it means to reintroduce
> it. Even if it rots, mark it as unmaintained and wait for someone to
> pick-up.
I question if this will hold true when gentoo-x86 goes git; at the
very least folding an arch back into mainline should be a helluva lot
easier.
Anyone got any comments on similar attempts?
~harring
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles
2010-02-11 15:54 [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles Torsten Veller
2010-02-11 16:06 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
2010-02-11 18:41 ` [gentoo-dev] " Brian Harring
@ 2010-02-25 10:30 ` Torsten Veller
2010-02-25 15:14 ` Mark Loeser
2010-02-25 23:57 ` Ryan Hill
2 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Torsten Veller @ 2010-02-25 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: mips
* Torsten Veller <tove@gentoo.org>:
> Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in
> profiles/profiles.desc?
Based on the current feedback I'll change it not earlier than friday
next week if nobody objects.
--
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles
2010-02-25 10:30 ` Torsten Veller
@ 2010-02-25 15:14 ` Mark Loeser
2010-02-25 15:24 ` Samuli Suominen
2010-02-25 23:57 ` Ryan Hill
1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Mark Loeser @ 2010-02-25 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev, mips
Torsten Veller <ml-en@veller.net> said:
> * Torsten Veller <tove@gentoo.org>:
> > Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in
> > profiles/profiles.desc?
>
> Based on the current feedback I'll change it not earlier than friday
> next week if nobody objects.
That would be nice. I'd also love to know why we need about 150
different profiles for MIPS...
--
Mark Loeser
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org
email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com
web - http://www.halcy0n.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles
2010-02-25 15:14 ` Mark Loeser
@ 2010-02-25 15:24 ` Samuli Suominen
2010-02-25 19:29 ` Robin H. Johnson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Samuli Suominen @ 2010-02-25 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 690 bytes --]
On 02/25/2010 05:14 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
> Torsten Veller <ml-en@veller.net> said:
>> * Torsten Veller <tove@gentoo.org>:
>>> Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in
>>> profiles/profiles.desc?
>>
>> Based on the current feedback I'll change it not earlier than friday
>> next week if nobody objects.
>
> That would be nice. I'd also love to know why we need about 150
> different profiles for MIPS...
>
Every machine type profile has a developer, desktop and server sub profile.
How about deleting those? If you are capable of setting up a Gentoo/MIPS
setup, then you are certainly capable of setting up few profile defaults
on your own too.
See attached patch
[-- Attachment #2: profiles.desc.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 13247 bytes --]
--- profiles.desc.orig 2010-02-25 17:19:46.000000000 +0200
+++ profiles.desc 2010-02-25 17:21:34.000000000 +0200
@@ -44,158 +44,41 @@
m68k default/linux/m68k/10.0/server dev
# MIPS Profiles
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/n32/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/n32/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/n32/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/n32 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/n64/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/n64/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/n64/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/n64 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/n32/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/n32/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/n32/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/n32 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/n64/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/n64/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/n64/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/n64 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/fulong dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/n32/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/n32/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/n32/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/n32 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/n64/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/n64/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/n64/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/n64 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2e/server dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/n32/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/n32/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/n32/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/n32 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/n64/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/n64/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/n64/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/n64 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/server dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/n32/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/n32/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/n32/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/n32 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/n64/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/n64/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/n64/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/n64 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/lemote/lm2f/yeeloong dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/n32/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/n32/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/n32/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/n32 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/n64/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/n64/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/n64/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/n64 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/mipsel dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/n32/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/n32/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/n32/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/n32 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/n64/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/n64/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/n64/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/n64 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/server dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/n32/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/n32/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/n32/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/n32 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/n64/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/n64/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/n64/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/n64 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip22 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/n32/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/n32/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/n32/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/n32 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/n64/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/n64/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/n64/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/n64 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip27 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/n32/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/n32/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/n32/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/n32 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/n64/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/n64/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/n64/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/n64 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip28 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/n32/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/n32/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/n32/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/n32 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/n64/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/n64/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/n64/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/n64 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip30 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/n32/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/n32/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/n32/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/n32 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/n64/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/n64/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/n64/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/n64 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/n32/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/n32/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/n32/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/n32 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/n64/desktop dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/n64/developer dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/n64/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/n64 dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/r10k dev
-mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32/server dev
mips default/linux/mips/10.0/sgi/ip32 dev
# PPC32 Profiles
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles
2010-02-25 15:24 ` Samuli Suominen
@ 2010-02-25 19:29 ` Robin H. Johnson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Robin H. Johnson @ 2010-02-25 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 895 bytes --]
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 05:24:25PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Every machine type profile has a developer, desktop and server sub profile.
>
> How about deleting those? If you are capable of setting up a Gentoo/MIPS
> setup, then you are certainly capable of setting up few profile defaults
> on your own too.
Or better yet, you can stack your own mix of profiles:
# rm /etc/make.profile
# mkdir /etc/make.profile
# cat >/etc/make.profile/parent <<EOF
/usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/mips/10.0/cobalt/n32
/usr/portage/profiles/targets/developer
EOF
This avoids the need for desktop/developer/server everywhere, as I'm not
aware of ANY end profile of those that applies any other changes.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead
E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 330 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles
2010-02-25 10:30 ` Torsten Veller
2010-02-25 15:14 ` Mark Loeser
@ 2010-02-25 23:57 ` Ryan Hill
2010-02-26 6:57 ` Torsten Veller
1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Ryan Hill @ 2010-02-25 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 596 bytes --]
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:30:32 +0100
Torsten Veller <ml-en@veller.net> wrote:
> * Torsten Veller <tove@gentoo.org>:
> > Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in
> > profiles/profiles.desc?
>
> Based on the current feedback I'll change it not earlier than friday
> next week if nobody objects.
Did you get feedback from anyone on mips@?
--
fonts, by design, by neglect
gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles
2010-02-25 23:57 ` Ryan Hill
@ 2010-02-26 6:57 ` Torsten Veller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Torsten Veller @ 2010-02-26 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
* Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org>:
> Torsten Veller <ml-en@veller.net> wrote:
> > * Torsten Veller <tove@gentoo.org>:
> > > Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in
> > > profiles/profiles.desc?
> >
> > Based on the current feedback I'll change it not earlier than friday
> > next week if nobody objects.
>
> Did you get feedback from anyone on mips@?
No, I don't think so. Nonetheless mips was CC'ed on the last mail.
I also got no reply to the keywording bugs waiting for mips.
--
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-26 6:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-02-11 15:54 [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles Torsten Veller
2010-02-11 16:06 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
2010-02-11 18:41 ` [gentoo-dev] " Brian Harring
2010-02-11 18:56 ` Jeremy Olexa
2010-02-11 19:08 ` Brian Harring
2010-02-11 19:16 ` Brian Harring
2010-02-11 19:21 ` Samuli Suominen
2010-02-11 21:12 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
2010-02-11 21:22 ` Brian Harring
2010-02-25 10:30 ` Torsten Veller
2010-02-25 15:14 ` Mark Loeser
2010-02-25 15:24 ` Samuli Suominen
2010-02-25 19:29 ` Robin H. Johnson
2010-02-25 23:57 ` Ryan Hill
2010-02-26 6:57 ` Torsten Veller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox