From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NfgV8-0007E8-D5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:23:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D3F80E0AA4; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:23:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8593CE0A5A for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so143711fga.10 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:22:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=PfDz1CCo3m45LCk7V3AdvIKz/sD+ruHDAP0tljpxq8w=; b=Bc2EnVEzgkWJDfW7E7QZQ5IZLlnjJTpiPsMvGWwQWaTDSdLyu8FoowrKK1HVjArm4g ZOsF+MotegyCjc9p14nIoT7+1DjVNv1aVqKcE0vDWFhF+4/vNBMjqtmayWB2pL6DEcJo H3uSPRxghyhReWxRYC0WtQDTAtM8+H1Fh3ZFc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=S9vcOKrgvSvjhVcuCNubajoCVWYTT6gW2VzhlheWaSP76mEcd2AgGyIMjR1PyZbijN z+rfhFZxUGmxA9wbyPthXHDNWFkKVRlFDTGgf0Zpy64ckdnkNhhwfcj3nSS1FVm00Dwp rvrWAo0OV0bnLcdXAvZIET9QKJgsuR2Vrl8go= Received: by 10.86.106.7 with SMTP id e7mr1314875fgc.1.1265923374773; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:22:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.gmail.com (c-98-210-130-131.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.210.130.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm1400912fxm.12.2010.02.11.13.22.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:22:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by smtp.gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:22:49 -0800 Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:22:49 -0800 From: Brian Harring To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles Message-ID: <20100211212249.GF20770@hrair> References: <20100211160404.TAb70b3.tv@veller.net> <20100211184141.GB20770@hrair> <20100211221244.480b164e@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7LkOrbQMr4cezO2T" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100211221244.480b164e@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: bc9a7a67-e434-416d-a1f2-243c00ecb0be X-Archives-Hash: 07e6235d578c2bb142dbf5602cdd4df6 --7LkOrbQMr4cezO2T Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:12:44PM +0100, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Jeremy Olexa : > > I would guess that it would be far easier to work in an overlay at > > this point. I would also guess that if there are ANY mips users out > > there that they would have to use some other ACCEPT_KEYWORDS value > > because the shape of ~mips is so...bad. >=20 > Don't remove an architecture. Ask vapier what it means to reintroduce > it. Even if it rots, mark it as unmaintained and wait for someone to > pick-up. I question if this will hold true when gentoo-x86 goes git; at the=20 very least folding an arch back into mainline should be a helluva lot=20 easier. Anyone got any comments on similar attempts? ~harring --7LkOrbQMr4cezO2T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkt0dSkACgkQsiLx3HvNzgePYACfQSrXpBNzTCCUIhbyZ8/6a8us ClQAoL9lBwvYHo1+H2BkqLQ5e5HAD5eK =guyu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7LkOrbQMr4cezO2T--