From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NfeWj-0004GF-OH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:16:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DE68E0B85; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:16:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f216.google.com (mail-ew0-f216.google.com [209.85.219.216]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F227E0B64 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so1771534ewy.29 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:16:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ZXIK9x9MFFZNM7IFlBC++mAeiewRftX2ToantRp4B+k=; b=wNEJFTDOoNlMBb8NOZUBNdloog72D0fx+C3uSyfcAzgC2kZIOn2t7aPlndu0253+O9 rPUqxKhRkXFtgfa1y3jjM5qdGKauuFA1RRPapk0OMpnUQ7xyccjzVsVITAVBNTX8k+Qw lFwjA4zHeUxna4nNEVqVHQ78uzoKa7GFnVEIg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=RbQZJ0VlJc6zyQ+WfPPfmPwt9DnusWqneJdjt873vhKXAVswjDPt3bb+2nSVZBrXeO LuQMVabNPAA3EhkvfVzjaSaFl94MKsHRa1uK0Eqsx0xHFPUka2C46RcmF40NXgGnudDn BlvNzIrDxy6ypZIPMkAesP9zc0HDxWAXsdUjA= Received: by 10.216.88.139 with SMTP id a11mr191198wef.50.1265915786694; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:16:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.gmail.com (c-98-210-130-131.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.210.130.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m5sm3960563gve.7.2010.02.11.11.16.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:16:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by smtp.gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:16:16 -0800 Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:16:16 -0800 From: Brian Harring To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles Message-ID: <20100211191615.GD20770@hrair> References: <20100211160404.TAb70b3.tv@veller.net> <20100211184141.GB20770@hrair> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s9fJI615cBHmzTOP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: a47f87db-86ef-4ded-86fb-4c3e7ec3ac29 X-Archives-Hash: d6d6783598ef02874dd1b3555be31b02 --s9fJI615cBHmzTOP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 06:56:58PM +0000, Jeremy Olexa wrote: > > At the very least if it's going to be kept around, experimental or=20 > > not, the number of profiles in use there *really* needs reduction-=20 > > mips has roughly 117 profiles listed in profiles.desc out of 217-=20 > > literally ~54% of all dev/stable/experimental profiles. Correction also- they've got 154 rather than 117, meaning 71% of=20 all profiles for a scan. Not sure how I screwed that number up, but aparently I managed it. ~harring --s9fJI615cBHmzTOP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkt0V38ACgkQsiLx3HvNzgdlOACeNxdJdjIs9WyYvl1muWEJ+soD pkQAn1QfiXvJsoMFYoS9hfeUCA+FCdNz =ZyS8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s9fJI615cBHmzTOP--