From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NfdzT-0007eE-Nb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:42:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 71C5EE0999; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com (mail-fx0-f218.google.com [209.85.220.218]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D34BAE093D for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:41:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so1524405fxm.29 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:41:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Yqj16ZeLXICrvUILzjR7oR5UFKt3hu8UqCWjus51sRk=; b=IsBvWar7DLMW0QucK2xoNTVJq8vHvN0zGcbNt1o4eL4b9G1TyJ45Z/0QUlQDkIuPtk aeU3Rd9b2pSNQ/fDrkEPz2nQtVMrJ8+2AnbaRjfbtq/Q0AO+mNXWnREEcwlB3yzc/Wac HmPAIyBNARXxXoXhJIHffzuo8vx7EnwXM0+YM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=UeVO76gqbfF3BVXk+Vfj4dMnCjJ4Rd8uGEftQFEkcfkX6zgyYCCRXrVmPsx6YYdUfD MZNqModRCmMqVSUhPC9jxjpUou9LyNW+fgIsOztxSZKigRLEYrrf0TADWA7kELu5REQY z5OAD3xFMZ/8HwEHvsaX+M+JtC/yI/0H3z0Do= Received: by 10.223.77.85 with SMTP id f21mr297219fak.40.1265913709204; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:41:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.gmail.com (c-98-210-130-131.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.210.130.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm1323256fxm.14.2010.02.11.10.41.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:41:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by smtp.gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:41:41 -0800 Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:41:41 -0800 From: Brian Harring To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles Message-ID: <20100211184141.GB20770@hrair> References: <20100211160404.TAb70b3.tv@veller.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100211160404.TAb70b3.tv@veller.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: 507f7c4f-e6fb-41bb-8a4f-4d8501b490e8 X-Archives-Hash: be393426980d12f341cabccfe5ab10aa --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 04:54:38PM +0100, Torsten Veller wrote: > Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in > profiles/profiles.desc? >=20 >=20 > The ~150 mips development profiles increase the time for a=20 > `repoman -d full` run in dev-perl/ from three to five minutes. That is > an increase of roughly 66 percent. > repoman further prints more than 2000 lines of output for two keywording > problems. Quick pcheck visibility scan of the full tree, stats follow: mips profiles still enabled: * 116191 seperate dependency issues, 1 line per profile/dependency=20 issue * roughly 2m39s run time mips profiles disabled (leaving mips-irix however) * 9550 seperate dependency issues, 1 line per profile/dependency issue * roughly 1m54s run time. So... mips accounts for about 30% of the pcheck runtime, and *92%* of=20 known visibility issues. As for the runtime difference between=20 pcheck/repoman, pcheck has some tricks internally to reduce the # of=20 profiles it has to scan down to just the unique USE/mask set- I'd=20 expect the mips impact to be far larger w/out that trick in place. At the very least if it's going to be kept around, experimental or=20 not, the number of profiles in use there *really* needs reduction-=20 mips has roughly 117 profiles listed in profiles.desc out of 217-=20 literally ~54% of all dev/stable/experimental profiles. Either way, stats to chew on. ~harring --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkt0T2UACgkQsiLx3HvNzgdmTQCfW0gleaBNls/yub+UMzYjrtyX zEsAn3WsfnC8AkrSZX6YdGHvFFC/yGYn =6Iyg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7--