public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Harring <ferringb@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:41:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100211184141.GB20770@hrair> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100211160404.TAb70b3.tv@veller.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1436 bytes --]

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 04:54:38PM +0100, Torsten Veller wrote:
> Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in
> profiles/profiles.desc?
> 
> 
> The ~150 mips development profiles increase the time for a 
> `repoman -d full` run in dev-perl/ from three to five minutes. That is
> an increase of roughly 66 percent.
> repoman further prints more than 2000 lines of output for two keywording
> problems.

Quick pcheck visibility scan of the full tree, stats follow:

mips profiles still enabled:
* 116191 seperate dependency issues, 1 line per profile/dependency 
  issue
* roughly 2m39s run time

mips profiles disabled (leaving mips-irix however)
* 9550 seperate dependency issues, 1 line per profile/dependency issue
* roughly 1m54s run time.

So... mips accounts for about 30% of the pcheck runtime, and *92%* of 
known visibility issues.  As for the runtime difference between 
pcheck/repoman, pcheck has some tricks internally to reduce the # of 
profiles it has to scan down to just the unique USE/mask set- I'd 
expect the mips impact to be far larger w/out that trick in place.

At the very least if it's going to be kept around, experimental or 
not, the number of profiles in use there *really* needs reduction- 
mips has roughly 117 profiles listed in profiles.desc out of 217- 
literally ~54%  of all dev/stable/experimental profiles.

Either way, stats to chew on.
~harring

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-11 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-11 15:54 [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles Torsten Veller
2010-02-11 16:06 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
2010-02-11 18:41 ` Brian Harring [this message]
2010-02-11 18:56   ` [gentoo-dev] " Jeremy Olexa
2010-02-11 19:08     ` Brian Harring
2010-02-11 19:16     ` Brian Harring
2010-02-11 19:21     ` Samuli Suominen
2010-02-11 21:12     ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
2010-02-11 21:22       ` Brian Harring
2010-02-25 10:30 ` Torsten Veller
2010-02-25 15:14   ` Mark Loeser
2010-02-25 15:24     ` Samuli Suominen
2010-02-25 19:29       ` Robin H. Johnson
2010-02-25 23:57   ` Ryan Hill
2010-02-26  6:57     ` Torsten Veller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100211184141.GB20770@hrair \
    --to=ferringb@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox