public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: "X" vs "gtk" USE flags
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:40:18 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100208154018.GA9583@linux1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <hkp0bm$fvc$2@ger.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1044 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 02:34:08PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 02/08/2010 02:11 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Nikos Chantziaras<realnc@arcor.de>:
> >> A Gnome user probably has "X gtk -qt" in make.conf, while a KDE user
> >> has "X qt -gtk" in hope to have programs that support both Gtk and Qt
> >> being built with the toolkit that is more native to his DE.  When a
> >> package has a GUI tool that is able to only use one of those
> >> toolkits, people who have it disabled in make.conf will get no GUI
> >> tool at all even though they have "X" in their USE flags.
> >
> >   Your proposal does not look to appealing to me.  What about people
> > trying to keep "pollution" down and avoid one or the other toolkit?
> 
> This would mean that we favor one group of people over another :P
 
If a package can run in some form without a certain toolkit, why should
we force people to install that toolkit with the package?  Imho that is
bloating their systems unnecessarily.

William


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-08 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-08 11:15 [gentoo-dev] "X" vs "gtk" USE flags Nikos Chantziaras
2010-02-08 11:30 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2010-02-08 11:39   ` Samuli Suominen
2010-02-08 12:32     ` [gentoo-dev] " Nikos Chantziaras
2010-02-08 13:41       ` AllenJB
2010-02-08 14:02         ` Nikos Chantziaras
2010-02-08 15:22           ` AllenJB
2010-02-08 18:26             ` Ben de Groot
2010-02-08 18:28             ` Ben de Groot
2010-02-08 19:21             ` Nikos Chantziaras
2010-02-08 11:36 ` [gentoo-dev] " AllenJB
2010-02-08 12:12   ` [gentoo-dev] " Nikos Chantziaras
2010-02-08 12:16     ` Samuli Suominen
2010-02-08 12:38       ` Nikos Chantziaras
2010-02-08 12:10 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Frysinger
2010-02-08 12:11 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
2010-02-08 12:34   ` Nikos Chantziaras
2010-02-08 15:40     ` William Hubbs [this message]
2010-02-08 21:39   ` Jeroen Roovers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100208154018.GA9583@linux1 \
    --to=williamh@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox