From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NWlxQ-0007dx-K0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:23:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 609A2E060C; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:22:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (smtprelay04.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.42]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31406E060C for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:22:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [93.210.51.3] (helo=arkane.local) by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1NWlwH-0001fb-2F for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:22:17 +0100 Received: by arkane.local (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E19D65C656; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:21:51 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:21:51 +0100 From: Torsten Veller To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3 Message-ID: <20100118081439.TAfa4bc.tv@veller.net> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <4B537558.2020600@gentoo.org> <201001172112.29643.levertond@googlemail.com> <201001171630.35257.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201001171630.35257.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Face: ===_______=8)_=8)_______A_very_very_nice_face_______=8)_=8)_______=== Jabber-ID: tove@jabber.ccc.de X-PGP-Fingerprint: 0416 3C11 8D79 65B9 AAD0 2065 BBC7 14D1 9C67 CD96 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) X-Df-Sender: 1067115 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 051552ab-908e-4c7a-adb3-1dd1d1b29e24 X-Archives-Hash: 711910d3ec541aaa35a71da93294dccb * Mike Frysinger : > On Sunday 17 January 2010 16:12:29 David Leverton wrote: > > On Sunday 17 January 2010 20:38:48 Petteri R=E4ty wrote: > > > With GLEP 42 and proper logging of e* messages I think we shouldn't > > > annoy users any more with ebeep or epause so attached is a patch on= ly > > > defines these functions for EAPIs 0, 1 and 2. Anyone have a reason = to > > > keep these around for EAPI 3? If not I will apply the attached patc= h. The patch only defines these functions for EAPI=3D0 and EAPI=3D1. > > The eclass-manpages comments should be updated too. >=20 > you mean you should re-emerge it on your system I think he means that the patch should modify @DESCRIPTION too.