From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NWbdo-0002ZP-07 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:22:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4622BE063F; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wp165.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp165.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.132.172]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E800E063F for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 84-238-114-252.u.parknet.dk ([84.238.114.252] helo=marsupilami.localnet); authenticated by wp165.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) id 1NWbd5-00059A-9x; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:21:47 +0100 From: Thilo Bangert To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: net-nntp/inn Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:20:46 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.31.11; KDE/4.3.4; i686; ; ) References: <201001112305.16532.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <20100115095008.5173fcbf@dante> In-Reply-To: Organization: Gentoo Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1662779.lXkBQFAMXy"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201001172120.48648.bangert@gentoo.org> X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;bangert@gentoo.org;1263759708;f31139ea; X-Archives-Salt: f2be367f-feac-41bd-9ef6-eef96e1dc31b X-Archives-Hash: 1bfda2992287a39a05e7a39feeb01d87 --nextPart1662779.lXkBQFAMXy Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ben de Groot said: > I think we have a bigger problem with packages that have a maintainer, > at least nominally, but said maintainer does not actually maintain the > package anymore. full ack. i was thinking that maybe we need an 'easy-fix' team, which can=20 do all the easy fixes, which have been laying around for way too long and=20 which aparently are "easy to fix" (ie. only waiting for somebody to=20 commit)... the details would stil have to be thought through, but anything which=20 improves the felt responsitivity for our users can only be good. Did you know: Gentoo is dying! ;-) kind regards Thilo >=20 --nextPart1662779.lXkBQFAMXy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAktTcSAACgkQxRElEoA5AndvaQCfdaJfmovWWtrXX9Me8tfbAbnM Z54AnAmADKwPx8goQFxYSbFkM30Yr1co =BJwu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1662779.lXkBQFAMXy--