From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39208-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1NWcQk-000185-2V
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:13:06 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EB73E0698;
	Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:12:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ew0-f224.google.com (mail-ew0-f224.google.com [209.85.219.224])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3AFE0698
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:12:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so2842182ewy.26
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:12:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date
         :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id;
        bh=zm2Cc1SGcj+rZ7UXKDz+rpoWPt4Uwh77W/21BvdZS38=;
        b=QxbnP8NVTGmyGOrkce9HU9Pzdb7VQhesgG074V43yaCbWLmhF+EzsSFbqTvFuj75is
         72A6sgXpCOZwzcQyN8rRdvThzOrXbYfQqhUJBxmNCTcDo+JI37IEjJLmwXKrhcjKEqF2
         LwT7xngJ4DO9QD32qocfCBrRlmeTcIxRUzL+0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :message-id;
        b=X+XR/FBfgwqOWQT7OYS6Qn7r/mbOZcoZUjVv6UcgS97JBxGglolT9IkBi6R+d8u58C
         ARENOKRvtt4QqeL93EccwHkzhTo954n6czU0WiC/TzjcB0ZD2kzdsnSApe1c4DOG5XTV
         GIB8IMDCeJQisKrts4F22Ctk3YQUiE0Og1IqE=
Received: by 10.213.39.129 with SMTP id g1mr5665284ebe.36.1263762755255;
        Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:12:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shiny-one.home (host86-176-72-2.range86-176.btcentralplus.com [86.176.72.2])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm3790385ewy.5.2010.01.17.13.12.34
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:12:34 -0800 (PST)
From: David Leverton <levertond@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:12:29 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
References: <4B537558.2020600@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <4B537558.2020600@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <201001172112.29643.levertond@googlemail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: e9782511-c4e3-4bac-ba36-f5310f0533f4
X-Archives-Hash: d7eaff098b2bee93f5f1cb3d387ae491

On Sunday 17 January 2010 20:38:48 Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote:
> With GLEP 42 and proper logging of e* messages I think we shouldn't
> annoy users any more with ebeep or epause so attached is a patch only
> defines these functions for EAPIs 0, 1 and 2. Anyone have a reason to
> keep these around for EAPI 3? If not I will apply the attached patch.

The eclass-manpages comments should be updated too.