From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NWci8-0003g6-9Z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:31:04 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C62AE073C; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:30:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D68E073C for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:30:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A4A67936 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:30:31 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3 Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:30:34 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.32.3; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <4B537558.2020600@gentoo.org> <201001172112.29643.levertond@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <201001172112.29643.levertond@googlemail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3799240.DN8nLGeImE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201001171630.35257.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: f3dddad6-22bf-4717-b01c-91c68631fb2d X-Archives-Hash: 0133d3b8f584378fd377c197c1b9ad7d --nextPart3799240.DN8nLGeImE Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday 17 January 2010 16:12:29 David Leverton wrote: > On Sunday 17 January 2010 20:38:48 Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > > With GLEP 42 and proper logging of e* messages I think we shouldn't > > annoy users any more with ebeep or epause so attached is a patch only > > defines these functions for EAPIs 0, 1 and 2. Anyone have a reason to > > keep these around for EAPI 3? If not I will apply the attached patch. >=20 > The eclass-manpages comments should be updated too. you mean you should re-emerge it on your system =2Dmike --nextPart3799240.DN8nLGeImE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJLU4F7AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBTDMP/3rcSEQwtr0Rt27QyXmxUSaQ xVFMeiy/OGJTIrVCG8CAdbNivue7mFcd+ctispu6tMGoFjHkdh8doyY1V3UDLigV bflT7RsarY/TsWyx+OUNIS9Wi+ab0iTwNbwQhjQhY2lS7cIPkM3iJcStwA36dXOk SBzX1R4xKxCDrkkJR+mwLnT90LRYxt2OuXwic46E5Ar8oGu31sLWfuuXfGjdKfXr 4aAwINp9WTjM5KtEV1YFHGENluVCcL4JAzOsWafhvMdVgIXzasTBENDmyAm8jbQT 9/xLGpF0BNzLs1Q3t3T0X82hMidH91JWrkgW9wvnl3Cqk6FWsBXSWiaZM7xWEbYh pEt+/bMtRR5E73B4FMSzu7aKWlERqflh0RAcv+tRosPwLwFliA8hsRNP7Zn+TA6q 4UzhKSkc9535D1P8lXHxE7GZVhsdXXq6B5TxnYS4RcwBRcCqISw2Svku/4ctKNzA YzgfJVO71s8gCnY/lsSLa0IXqBDh0/RIdIRUwpZzFci7pQryQXweeRkFQpo5RLq9 rclZws4ZVoDQnkQ5TFkD/ot40tQAQY/ZBBYJkDXEHCbHKproBk3+YGYnf52UKqon nh7UhB4XJe7a4YZyQ96v5DNrj13mYgHfg0yLwpyoj6kJP/j4AKfrjE+UOs6pgm3d monwxTQtOWA/dJ9mGUVU =M4+p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3799240.DN8nLGeImE--