From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVxkT-0007gv-GZ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:46:49 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 663BDE071D; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:45:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E60FE071D for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:45:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E2467EBC; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:45:57 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:45:49 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.32.3; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Sebastian Pipping References: <4B50C3B4.5050604@gentoo.org> <4B50FB3B.60506@gentoo.org> <4B511556.4080409@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4B511556.4080409@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2620964.DlDX2ciybV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201001152046.00963.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 910d2234-a5e5-4158-8035-346c865f08d0 X-Archives-Hash: aadc5574c890dbd81de6b03e7c981fd9 --nextPart2620964.DlDX2ciybV Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday 15 January 2010 20:24:38 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > On 01/16/10 00:33, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > > - From the alternatives, /var/lib/layman doesn't sound right. If > > /var/cache/layman doesn't work, what about /var/spool/layman instead? >=20 > Okay, how about >=20 > /var/spool/layman >=20 > then? Any objections? /var/spool/ is a terrible idea -- these are not jobs being queued waiting t= o=20 be processed by a daemon and then removed. if you want to keep all of layman's stuff together, then about your only=20 option is to create your own tree at like /var/layman/. the better idea=20 though would be to split your stuff along the proper lines. cache files =3D /var/cache/layman/ config files =3D /etc/layman/ =2Dmike --nextPart2620964.DlDX2ciybV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJLURpYAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBXRYP+gPiEHo/OagQ0q65ozxRjEsx ByXSiSHjGU3U8ymSlMAGMK0qBOvr+g8RRwkgs0/ZGM3y5VB0TTlErK6BTm31KSoa SMfcdVQ5hXYBgMUJSZVQ8IagGptGO0roQjP7qk6g5GXsjTfLOryHj9JRI/ilyvMG LGDfUcg7MxPNGf9ca4apgtKL1pBj4EeFz9Swmw5RxvYtWwNyXDTisQjcF2nFjqWD 72GaqeUQWpawuDgAdnPXN5DJb73xoEOfQ0bioVR6Lq3rdNG7dkTbIvuuaNKdBL6o cYq0olRvGc3JlKDMGOiWHco81MfXo9u0GLdpa9PXX2YrqDdSBz59KTNEDiFieDWr LJ8AsA1XCNdViB8IxqeAWfAZp1CISOyNKw3nl21ASkE237MKWwW+yGTxDn1rWYuh CGYelE6mhFDlUbwd4LVmfQ2RtdLf45txGBfSpPK5+Gk3qMnf9+R6ezQ6Mz+SZanz Puntm2gpWKXlHKpnkaSEQK1kQYC2jdMWGO9BXLwKRlqt9pawlCx/DJgbcE7Xs5hk pwywu+EimobgyojRfscs1gMaiA93GZ4nfJCdFWOD1DSP08SZn5nudL/8Lfec6YP7 atq2xOr8ltiDqevTdo2HMUKR5ctHLh1zD5FeT8PVxhnH9KdnVczgWaLRjhjs0705 Lk54oXduTcnC7XVfQ9is =P6il -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2620964.DlDX2ciybV--