From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVPnA-00018Z-RK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:31:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32F24E08AD; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:30:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpauth11.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpauth11.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.33]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E535E08AD for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:30:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26850 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2010 13:30:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (94.66.160.145) by smtpauth11.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.33) with ESMTP; 14 Jan 2010 13:30:37 -0000 From: Markos Chandras To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:30:25 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.32-zen4-night-elf; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <201001112305.16532.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <201001131054.03953.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1969561.JJmfiXLV3A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201001141530.34254.hwoarang@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 2a987146-964a-4f17-98ef-be599cd30764 X-Archives-Hash: e678c143c997b637e0e343f2cc6060b2 --nextPart1969561.JJmfiXLV3A Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday 13 January 2010 23:02:17 Ben de Groot wrote: > 2010/1/13 Mike Frysinger : > > On Tuesday 12 January 2010 15:35:45 Ben de Groot wrote: > >> 2010/1/12 Markos Chandras : > >> > If you feel like it, become a proxy-maintainer and poke a developer = to > >> > put your ebuilds on tree. Have you ever heard of that ? :) > >> > >> Proxy-maintainership should be given a MUCH higher profile in Gentoo, > >> in my opinion. It is a virtually unknown option. > > > > i think our current work flows also significantly impede the smooth > > running of this. if we had were using a dscm (git) on gentoo-x86, i fe= el > > like it'd be a much smoother ride for Gentoo devs to pull from a proxy > > maintainer and push on their behalf. > > -mike >=20 > I couldn't agree more! >=20 My experience as developer this years implies that decisions about these=20 things take way too long to get implemented ( or even discussed ). So imho,= =20 the best way to promote the proxy-maintainer thing, is individually using o= ur=20 blogs or any other means. =2D-=20 Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org --nextPart1969561.JJmfiXLV3A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAktPHHoACgkQ9/cejkQaxBA8aQCfbMBCufap0i0ooZWVP1XWx87i GjoAn0DENEFWlaeHGvddb3FrHttpZKVC =Or4w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1969561.JJmfiXLV3A--