From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NV49o-0007vI-E8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:25:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BBDEE0632; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:24:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E60E0632 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:24:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698A41B411F for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:24:17 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: net-nntp/inn Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:24:32 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.32.2; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <201001112305.16532.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <201001121533.08479.vapier@gentoo.org> <4B4CE0D0.9070207@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4B4CE0D0.9070207@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2850492.4irCW4P6oK"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201001130924.33139.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: f9be96ac-7ec6-4c12-b94a-8b5f368a5c16 X-Archives-Hash: bb10049ebb4b3e4ba40a3ca0747b3d95 --nextPart2850492.4irCW4P6oK Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 12 January 2010 15:51:28 Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 Chv=C3=A1tal wrote: > Your approach of adding new packages to main tree is that you add them > with empty metadata.xml and we have to remove them in few years because > they are steaming piles of bugs... not that this is relevant at all to my point, but when i notice such bugs,= =20 i'll fix them. but if no one cc's me, then i dont generally notice. > Lack of maintainer incorrect > open bugs are valid reasons. the *type* of bug matters, not the existence of an open bug. take any numb= er=20 of the trivial QA bugs open related to an extra empty dir or split docs --= =20 none are valid for punting an otherwise perfectly working package. > And since WE want to enable as-needed as default at some time we need to > work on the bugs which isnt going to happen =2Dmike --nextPart2850492.4irCW4P6oK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJLTdehAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBSlIQAKKBzpECqppO6BaDe1gTFoXa kBY6UHrHU91TrcrlSR+rLAbQV45bP1IPAAG/DsoF0t1YRS90Zw6HVb1sgoB6Lo7D uuXkL8rLKvHPeVXTYIR6f/GLW3TXqjyNqgkeR5J56kLgJlwF3WWumUTmjdk/Rlfp icyRgCDt+6/gffreTn6JmD9Q2RtVeSqCkk9y+Z2JjJc6ar0gQPSTgDoWGpbIfDsv eL19wIHQTH/RCscP3Gszy4T2DpLrgda8XkUEe+M1SChCPZW4eMJL0Vf0gMb+KMgP qHTHVZzcpNQ7GBSm6RgnUx2gy8CXI1V3oTbXGsyvbn2vPhlHooI8yWcja7QcDfzJ 0px71982BeY66HJadTkvP9iChQnvaB+iLyUTH2eT9FAqHb3PlPxKkyQZ9uV+A1L6 0Ja95mLBEQW17dl/asnIXNgiXOHKlbmkYKGZnTQAbqoTsYZGflGGbya2m3YJHAmT hh3fEa8m2t9WiNN/sR84loIposx4Nl2shvU+E2E4Pu7LOjFMbRBB718JWOgKFhPE zni4Xz4PO39wuEN77Hiv4fn1ovpd2bvA5EEJ1orL5t6/omdNldU4kmz0xOK3xLD4 zEwvqr+dClf2XF4MSnHTQxqpq9U/IJL+C5hs8NJv4IFbRnQFHHlrN173uNvPWeRX 9mmopkzXutjFCM2kAch4 =Swks -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2850492.4irCW4P6oK--