From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NUw5u-000684-FS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 05:48:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CCB1E05CF; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 05:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.39]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0289E05CF for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 05:48:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from epia.jer-c2.orkz.net (atwork-106.r-212.178.112.atwork.nl [212.178.112.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0D5mINT021546 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 06:48:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jer@gentoo.org) Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 06:48:18 +0100 From: Jeroen Roovers To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: net-nntp/inn Message-ID: <20100113064818.0988dc9c@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: References: <201001112305.16532.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <201001121832.11523.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <20100112192159.0fa03cd1@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <201001122030.27164.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <4B4CC87A.80503@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Archives-Salt: 2554a676-9bb3-404c-8304-c7937408bd32 X-Archives-Hash: 388e53b83eccee7a6066a992458d5cbd On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > So going with this idea... Isn't the treecleaner masking 30-day at > present? What about extending that just a bit, to 5 weeks total, > while reducing the actual masking to 4 weeks, with the extra week a > wait time between the traditional last-rites mail and the masking? No, masking for removal should take 30 days. I strongly feel that before treecleaner@ does any masking, an announcement should go to -dev@ and -announce@ a pretty long time in advance, maybe two months, especially with the two cockups a month that I am counting now. jer