From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NUnPl-0006Py-SO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:32:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 153DCE089D; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB04E089D for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:31:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6710E67DBC for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:31:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-nntp/inn Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:31:34 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.32.2; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <201001112305.16532.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <201001111731.09331.vapier@gentoo.org> <20100112020040.79c7f1ae@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <20100112020040.79c7f1ae@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1562755.bWm7YeM0PC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201001121531.34862.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 5a1593eb-f5b5-4ebe-91fe-d93f09baa515 X-Archives-Hash: 0cb719a219934ab36b2285b9cccaa6e8 --nextPart1562755.bWm7YeM0PC Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday 11 January 2010 20:00:40 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:31:08 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Monday 11 January 2010 16:05:16 Markos Chandras wrote: > > > # Markos Chandras (11 Jan 2010) > > > # Fails with -Wl,--as-needed > > > # bug #182782. Removal in 30 days > > > net-nntp/inn > > > > is as-needed support really a valid reason for punting a package ? i > > dont think it is. >=20 > Bad research - he simply lists the wrong reason. Lack of maintainer > attention would have been a better description. which is still not a good enough reason for removal if the version in the t= ree=20 still works =2Dmike --nextPart1562755.bWm7YeM0PC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJLTNwmAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WB/vcQAKjC63gPhq9rES5Us9MWsF+p 1x6lQUknm6Df6GmMCope0zs9BJDU3Ts2RnG313W2Dye91tB+N1oloW2m6ZNIE6QH QQyinMPWrRxGyLxzZuoZXsQD5a8fqLhhJBKPpJzQSF4xxJZb18DBq8EfQ5bA/ntr 75SPQj6pphw1xeUtdea3mwshPIYUspmcsnq4fXBKKMs9fSXprwNUmdFy4wuY3q5q 9mVg7IXQLK1BTTC0NLfZuaoE2WEEdttffFlyaE3BVnrIzrACNUbRwyyz4jaIVPAY mAhTfuv71EiJVmK24rG6TKorj0YBM8WdNslD0G4cIYxDsKYLowtP8jyZZLhQawGP IiaZi58AVacl8UQJRnYwX2rgezh63wSu1LZnuac95xn7AweQITEDqoxy43V1TaIw vpu/gLnqyfXeB3j5qv8K5VpOFS7G9xNso6tvFAAgMD8U6a8YE0ccg8PriBJZOY6M u0fNhop18zHL4tXEUUXbGgoyWqdwqRi1gIHR44kszOoz3Wsg9aloxF66BqBlY4Zx MqDCD0Z2CtWHhl6PFB7ZMRpyzfM0x0AmSuwyf9CC0cv8QWq0IVSf8hrDtOsqwnzJ eXwLkRaLA6NZTeUIkgxilRJmbvHjip/JpO9sCDTBg/cfiVvTcxq/ZlrG3YC6aUnt D9dVwrspeDWnBnlBmOhT =1eTU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1562755.bWm7YeM0PC--