From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NUfV3-0005I0-6y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:05:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF87EE07E4 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f228.google.com (mail-fx0-f228.google.com [209.85.220.228]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C851CE0710 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm28 with SMTP id 28so13655913fxm.26 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:13:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=Z3O0zvsDGyv5ltrp8JEV6v9L1UjYuEjsGq0LkF0o4Rk=; b=aoM/sGyQbSa3ZTAcl+1TSsMfsJ9vrip7/pSlps8O5abWZSiEpoLBrIGJ7jKTBHV4YK t755pQMjGcok6aMSUBDkJ7dsGNQ3F0GXAK3tzx3fGQwQM7UB2U7fKOkqHuiKCDVDaP85 S2wgJGpcE84mRp+By536x1esQpgKksq6sRKJc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=iDF45SIenpKlv7scVzyMFFznZO1zhjMhGU7gRehXk3uXPGPFSB9tPnQit6WOFYrOWB z7eDXwqozZMIZz2qjl5u5CEwWm6XuH2ZCKg5jwJvYi3o5hmCv6cNGhEjUxZeL1Wv/18S D8NQsm1lA/QVhzd8jHuH2nwwNrig7g9dmJ7Js= Received: by 10.103.126.29 with SMTP id d29mr6309272mun.28.1263291178632; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:12:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowmobile (cpc1-sgyl18-0-0-cust846.sgyl.cable.virginmedia.com [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s10sm38424777mue.51.2010.01.12.02.12.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:12:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:12:52 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] adding a modification timestamp to the installed pkgs database (vdb) Message-ID: <20100112101252.1d63a6a5@snowmobile> In-Reply-To: <7c612fc61001111435s5caaf80dx4629d81447ab52e8@mail.gmail.com> References: <20091026015005.GA12250@hrair.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <7c612fc61001111435s5caaf80dx4629d81447ab52e8@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.18.5; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/e3ZhZDsIhEtEn.sCE6JVHK_"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 6c393c53-c1d5-4119-b980-24c8a420fad2 X-Archives-Hash: d25216625911adcd35abcf241408f77c --Sig_/e3ZhZDsIhEtEn.sCE6JVHK_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:35:51 -0700 Denis Dupeyron wrote: > I'm a bit surprised by the low amount of discussions this topic has > generated. There's no discussion because Brian refuses to address any comments on the proposal and just says "we should do it anyway, and if you want it done properly instead, do it yourself". --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/e3ZhZDsIhEtEn.sCE6JVHK_ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktMSycACgkQ96zL6DUtXhERHwCgyttEC9hYAplShUljrGc5fji4 HUAAn3190qJREjjfo46fxAWTOAJFa0Er =uJ3k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/e3ZhZDsIhEtEn.sCE6JVHK_--