From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NUUQJ-0000EW-NG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:15:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EFD6E0941 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:15:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.nocworld.net (mx1.nocworld.net [213.218.133.51]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B7BE0806 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:30:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cassis.cusae.net (adsl.cusae.com [81.57.24.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.nocworld.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EF881A26E2 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:30:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from citron.localdomain (citron.cusae.net [192.168.5.3]) by cassis.cusae.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010AB7025F for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:30:24 +0100 (CET) Received: by citron.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 501) id 01716E2EBB3; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:30:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:30:24 +0100 From: Arnaud Launay To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: net-nntp/inn Message-ID: <20100111233024.GF8358@launay.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <201001112305.16532.hwoarang@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201001112305.16532.hwoarang@gentoo.org> X-PGP-Key: http://launay.org/pgpkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: 8e2f0e80-279e-4b29-a9dd-c3e0475459be X-Archives-Hash: 8fbd60e8019ad3701e79a1fdd53bf44e --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, Le Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:05:16PM +0200, Markos Chandras a =E9crit: > # Markos Chandras (11 Jan 2010) > # Fails with -Wl,--as-needed > # bug #182782. Removal in 30 days > net-nntp/inn As a newsmaster, I'm a bit concerned by this. By viewing bug #182782 , it seems to me that only inn <=3D2.4.* is concerned by this bug, and that >=3D2.5 does not have it. But, if I understand this announce correctly, the complete inn port will be dropped to oblivion. Wouldn't it be better to stabilize inn 2.5 (there's even a 2.5.1 release out there, with a quite reactive support/dev team, to which this "bug" could be pushed and corrected), than to just drop inn entirely ? Or maybe I'm just plain wrong, in which case I will happily stand corrected. Arnaud. --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktLtJAACgkQGDnxpQ/p9z163wCfZD1ZJM/V8vvCGqO0BHN3/vu2 LaYAnijVFK0owSCvAArq5eA7QiDWwz/N =Hsw1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG--