From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Thomas Sachau <tommy@gentoo.org>,
Denis Dupeyron <calchan@gentoo.org>,
"gentoo-council" <gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 01:59:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201001080159.25926.vapier@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B34C584.6070307@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1479 bytes --]
On Friday 25 December 2009 09:00:36 Thomas Sachau wrote:
> On 12/25/2009 06:10 AM, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Thomas Sachau <tommy@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> I will make it short, since i already requested it 3 times, did create a
> >> thread at gentoo-dev ML:
> >>
> >> agenda topic: Discussion and approval for following item:
> >>
> >> Adding real multilib features from current multilib-portage to currently
> >> hardmasked and testing portage-2.2* for wider testing, more eyes looking
> >> at it and hopefully more people helping improving it, so we can get a
> >> version, which most can accept for PMS and maybe next EAPI.
> >
> > Sorry, I forgot to send an email explaining what happened on the
> > council alias as promised. The consensus was that the project wasn't
> > mature enough to go ahead. Also more generally the council's job isn't
> > discussing but deciding, approving, etc... Discussing is what should
> > happen on mailing lists.
>
> Since i see noone arguing against adding the multilib features to current
> testing branch of portage, the discussion part already seems to be done.
> so a simple approval is ok, drop the discussion request.
that's incorrect. you still havent addressed my outstanding issues. until
you do, i dont see how you can push for this being added to portage. or i
missed some update along the way, but the last e-mail i see is from me dated
26.10.2009 ...
-mike
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-08 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <7c612fc60912150854k608270cag61c533542075f5bf@mail.gmail.com>
2009-12-20 13:53 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date Thomas Sachau
2009-12-25 5:10 ` Denis Dupeyron
2009-12-25 14:00 ` Thomas Sachau
2009-12-26 3:28 ` Doug Goldstein
2009-12-26 10:25 ` Fabian Groffen
2009-12-26 13:15 ` Thomas Sachau
2009-12-27 3:40 ` Zac Medico
2010-01-08 9:09 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-01-08 6:59 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2009-12-20 14:49 ` Fabian Groffen
2009-12-20 17:37 ` Jeremy Olexa
2009-12-20 20:01 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-12-20 20:04 ` Fabian Groffen
2009-12-21 3:16 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-12-21 7:54 ` Fabian Groffen
2009-12-21 11:30 ` Richard Freeman
2009-12-21 12:22 ` Fabian Groffen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201001080159.25926.vapier@gentoo.org \
--to=vapier@gentoo.org \
--cc=calchan@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=tommy@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox