public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: virtual/{cron,dev-manager,inetd,libc,linux-sources,man,os-headers,package-manager,skkserv,ssh,w3m}
@ 2011-09-22  8:53 Ulrich Mueller
  2011-09-22 10:59 ` Anthony G. Basile
  2011-09-22 18:23 ` Tim Harder
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ulrich Mueller @ 2011-09-22  8:53 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

Hi,

In the course of the old-style to new-style transition of virtuals,
I had taken maintainership of several new-style virtual packages.

After several months have passed without any bugs showing up, I
believe it's time that I drop maintainership of these:

   virtual/cron
   virtual/dev-manager
   virtual/inetd
   virtual/libc
   virtual/linux-sources
   virtual/man
   virtual/os-headers
   virtual/package-manager
   virtual/skkserv
   virtual/ssh
   virtual/w3m

As these are virtuals, I won't expect that there will be much
maintenance required. Also, all of them will fall back to (at least)
one herd. Please check the respective metadata.xml files for details.

Ulrich



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: virtual/{cron,dev-manager,inetd,libc,linux-sources,man,os-headers,package-manager,skkserv,ssh,w3m}
  2011-09-22  8:53 [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: virtual/{cron,dev-manager,inetd,libc,linux-sources,man,os-headers,package-manager,skkserv,ssh,w3m} Ulrich Mueller
@ 2011-09-22 10:59 ` Anthony G. Basile
  2011-09-22 18:23 ` Tim Harder
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Anthony G. Basile @ 2011-09-22 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On 09/22/2011 04:53 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>    virtual/linux-sources
>
I can take this one if the kernel herd is okay with that.

-- 
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail    : blueness@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP  : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88  33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535
GnuPG ID  : D0455535




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: virtual/{cron,dev-manager,inetd,libc,linux-sources,man,os-headers,package-manager,skkserv,ssh,w3m}
  2011-09-22  8:53 [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: virtual/{cron,dev-manager,inetd,libc,linux-sources,man,os-headers,package-manager,skkserv,ssh,w3m} Ulrich Mueller
  2011-09-22 10:59 ` Anthony G. Basile
@ 2011-09-22 18:23 ` Tim Harder
  2011-09-22 19:54   ` Mike Frysinger
  2011-09-23  7:59   ` Ulrich Mueller
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tim Harder @ 2011-09-22 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 909 bytes --]

On 2011-09-22 Thu 01:53, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> In the course of the old-style to new-style transition of virtuals,
> I had taken maintainership of several new-style virtual packages.

> After several months have passed without any bugs showing up, I
> believe it's time that I drop maintainership of these:

>    virtual/cron
>    virtual/dev-manager
>    virtual/inetd
>    virtual/libc
>    virtual/linux-sources
>    virtual/man
>    virtual/os-headers
>    virtual/package-manager
>    virtual/skkserv
>    virtual/ssh
>    virtual/w3m

> As these are virtuals, I won't expect that there will be much
> maintenance required. Also, all of them will fall back to (at least)
> one herd. Please check the respective metadata.xml files for details.

Personally I don't see why all of these need specific maintainers beyond
the herds they fall under already, especially if they are very low
maintenance.

Tim

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: virtual/{cron,dev-manager,inetd,libc,linux-sources,man,os-headers,package-manager,skkserv,ssh,w3m}
  2011-09-22 18:23 ` Tim Harder
@ 2011-09-22 19:54   ` Mike Frysinger
  2011-09-23  7:59   ` Ulrich Mueller
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2011-09-22 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1169 bytes --]

On Thursday, September 22, 2011 14:23:55 Tim Harder wrote:
> On 2011-09-22 Thu 01:53, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > In the course of the old-style to new-style transition of virtuals,
> > I had taken maintainership of several new-style virtual packages.
> > 
> > After several months have passed without any bugs showing up, I
> > 
> > believe it's time that I drop maintainership of these:
> >    virtual/cron
> >    virtual/dev-manager
> >    virtual/inetd
> >    virtual/libc
> >    virtual/linux-sources
> >    virtual/man
> >    virtual/os-headers
> >    virtual/package-manager
> >    virtual/skkserv
> >    virtual/ssh
> >    virtual/w3m
> > 
> > As these are virtuals, I won't expect that there will be much
> > maintenance required. Also, all of them will fall back to (at least)
> > one herd. Please check the respective metadata.xml files for details.
> 
> Personally I don't see why all of these need specific maintainers beyond
> the herds they fall under already, especially if they are very low
> maintenance.

right.  if they don't have herds, then almost all of these are obvious as to 
which they should get added to.
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: virtual/{cron,dev-manager,inetd,libc,linux-sources,man,os-headers,package-manager,skkserv,ssh,w3m}
  2011-09-22 18:23 ` Tim Harder
  2011-09-22 19:54   ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2011-09-23  7:59   ` Ulrich Mueller
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ulrich Mueller @ 2011-09-23  7:59 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

>>>>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Tim Harder wrote:

>> As these are virtuals, I won't expect that there will be much
>> maintenance required. Also, all of them will fall back to (at
>> least) one herd.

> Personally I don't see why all of these need specific maintainers
> beyond the herds they fall under already, especially if they are
> very low maintenance.

Right, but still I think that a heads-up should be sent in such
a case, instead of silently removing oneself from metadata.

Ulrich



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-23  8:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-09-22  8:53 [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: virtual/{cron,dev-manager,inetd,libc,linux-sources,man,os-headers,package-manager,skkserv,ssh,w3m} Ulrich Mueller
2011-09-22 10:59 ` Anthony G. Basile
2011-09-22 18:23 ` Tim Harder
2011-09-22 19:54   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-23  7:59   ` Ulrich Mueller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox