Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns

["Mario Fetka (geos_one)" <mario.fetka@gmail.com>]

Am Samstag 26 Dezember 2009 06:47:51 schrieb Victor Ostorga:
> On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:00:22 -0800
> 
> Joshua Saddler <nightmorph@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:40:06 -0600
> >
> > Victor Ostorga <vostorga@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > # Víctor Ostorga <vostorga@gentoo.org> (23 Dec 2009)
> > > # Last bump in 2005, does not build against current
> > > # stable net-nds/openldap-2.4.19-r1 bug #247956
> > > # Removal in 30 days
> > > net-dns/ldapdns
> >
> > So what about http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ldapdns-guide.xml -- you
> > want the GDP to just remove the doc? We can do that.
> 
> Yes, it will be needed to remove the doc.
> 
> > Is there a compatible drop-in replacement that will allow us to
> > s/ldapdns/foo throughout the guide?
> 
> Unfortunately, I don't know an exact replacemente for ldapdns, at some
> point I heard about a LDAP sdb back-end for BIND 9 [1], but don't know
> if it is still functional.
> 
> [1] http://bind9-ldap.bayour.com/
> 
and also powerdns
has ldap support
the bind sdb ldap backand is in tree
both ldap backands share the same ldap structure with some small diffferences

Mario