* [gentoo-dev] Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns
@ 2009-12-23 16:40 Victor Ostorga
2009-12-25 15:00 ` Joshua Saddler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Victor Ostorga @ 2009-12-23 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev-announce, gentoo-dev
# Víctor Ostorga <vostorga@gentoo.org> (23 Dec 2009)
# Last bump in 2005, does not build against current
# stable net-nds/openldap-2.4.19-r1 bug #247956
# Removal in 30 days
net-dns/ldapdns
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns
2009-12-23 16:40 [gentoo-dev] Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns Victor Ostorga
@ 2009-12-25 15:00 ` Joshua Saddler
2009-12-26 5:47 ` Victor Ostorga
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Saddler @ 2009-12-25 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 524 bytes --]
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:40:06 -0600
Victor Ostorga <vostorga@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> # Víctor Ostorga <vostorga@gentoo.org> (23 Dec 2009)
> # Last bump in 2005, does not build against current
> # stable net-nds/openldap-2.4.19-r1 bug #247956
> # Removal in 30 days
> net-dns/ldapdns
>
So what about http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ldapdns-guide.xml -- you want the GDP to just remove the doc? We can do that.
Is there a compatible drop-in replacement that will allow us to s/ldapdns/foo throughout the guide?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns
2009-12-25 15:00 ` Joshua Saddler
@ 2009-12-26 5:47 ` Victor Ostorga
2009-12-26 7:42 ` Mario Fetka (geos_one)
2009-12-26 14:19 ` Joshua Saddler
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Victor Ostorga @ 2009-12-26 5:47 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 922 bytes --]
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:00:22 -0800
Joshua Saddler <nightmorph@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:40:06 -0600
> Victor Ostorga <vostorga@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > # Víctor Ostorga <vostorga@gentoo.org> (23 Dec 2009)
> > # Last bump in 2005, does not build against current
> > # stable net-nds/openldap-2.4.19-r1 bug #247956
> > # Removal in 30 days
> > net-dns/ldapdns
> >
>
> So what about http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ldapdns-guide.xml -- you
> want the GDP to just remove the doc? We can do that.
>
Yes, it will be needed to remove the doc.
> Is there a compatible drop-in replacement that will allow us to
> s/ldapdns/foo throughout the guide?
Unfortunately, I don't know an exact replacemente for ldapdns, at some
point I heard about a LDAP sdb back-end for BIND 9 [1], but don't know
if it is still functional.
[1] http://bind9-ldap.bayour.com/
Regards,
Víctor
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns
2009-12-26 5:47 ` Victor Ostorga
@ 2009-12-26 7:42 ` Mario Fetka (geos_one)
2009-12-26 14:19 ` Joshua Saddler
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mario Fetka (geos_one) @ 2009-12-26 7:42 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Am Samstag 26 Dezember 2009 06:47:51 schrieb Victor Ostorga:
> On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:00:22 -0800
>
> Joshua Saddler <nightmorph@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:40:06 -0600
> >
> > Victor Ostorga <vostorga@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > # Víctor Ostorga <vostorga@gentoo.org> (23 Dec 2009)
> > > # Last bump in 2005, does not build against current
> > > # stable net-nds/openldap-2.4.19-r1 bug #247956
> > > # Removal in 30 days
> > > net-dns/ldapdns
> >
> > So what about http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ldapdns-guide.xml -- you
> > want the GDP to just remove the doc? We can do that.
>
> Yes, it will be needed to remove the doc.
>
> > Is there a compatible drop-in replacement that will allow us to
> > s/ldapdns/foo throughout the guide?
>
> Unfortunately, I don't know an exact replacemente for ldapdns, at some
> point I heard about a LDAP sdb back-end for BIND 9 [1], but don't know
> if it is still functional.
>
> [1] http://bind9-ldap.bayour.com/
>
and also powerdns
has ldap support
the bind sdb ldap backand is in tree
both ldap backands share the same ldap structure with some small diffferences
Mario
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns
2009-12-26 5:47 ` Victor Ostorga
2009-12-26 7:42 ` Mario Fetka (geos_one)
@ 2009-12-26 14:19 ` Joshua Saddler
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Saddler @ 2009-12-26 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 608 bytes --]
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 23:47:51 -0600
Victor Ostorga <vostorga@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Yes, it will be needed to remove the doc.
>
> > Is there a compatible drop-in replacement that will allow us to
> > s/ldapdns/foo throughout the guide?
>
> Unfortunately, I don't know an exact replacemente for ldapdns, at some
> point I heard about a LDAP sdb back-end for BIND 9 [1], but don't know
> if it is still functional.
>
> [1] http://bind9-ldap.bayour.com/
Well, without documentation on how to use it, we can't do anything, so I just removed the LDAP DNS guide entirely. RESO FIXED from the GDP.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-26 16:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-23 16:40 [gentoo-dev] Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns Victor Ostorga
2009-12-25 15:00 ` Joshua Saddler
2009-12-26 5:47 ` Victor Ostorga
2009-12-26 7:42 ` Mario Fetka (geos_one)
2009-12-26 14:19 ` Joshua Saddler
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox